Ah the accusation. The exclamation point of the enlightened.
Ah the accusation. The exclamation point of the enlightened.
That… utterly failed to address my point. Or even come close to it.
And then it got solid upvotes.
THIS is an example of… ah fuck it.
Well that would be an example of automation that needs improving.
That’s what software developers do, right?
Yes yes. So virtuous and obedient.
But consider this. Take all your well-worn arguments for the vax and every time you see “vax”, replace that with “brainchip”.
You see how it works.
That’s lovely.
Ya I know.
Thing is, I’m an outlier. I post strange stuff. And the 99% is the opposite. So our ideas of what’s comfortable may differ.
Or maybe I’m just posting to the wrong subs
Our posts and comments are the treasure here.
A better analogy would be a bank. You deposit some money and then the bank says “this is my money”.
That would be fucked up. Right?
Is it just the subs I go to or does this place go torches and pitchforks on anybody with a strange idea?
Something algorithmic. I have a couple ideas in that direction.
Assuming a good moderation automation, what good reason would anybody have for wanting the job?
An unjust system is a filter that prefers stupid. I think that’s fair to say. And with time the stupid only amplifies via positive feedback.
So it’s a choice between stupid and chaos.
Hmm, tough choice.
No power to the membership. All power to the moderators. No courts. No legal process. Moderators’ rule is law. No necessity to even explain or justify their actions. As if it were their house.
Then stupidville suits you.
Tell me what my agenda was.
yes.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Yes, pretty much
I think I’m going to tune my feed.
That’s nice. Did you copy paste it or do you have it memorized?
But it’s our conversation.
You imply that the server has greater value than the conversation. That isn’t so.