

“Prime Minister of Singapore receives $1 million pay increase” . You are welcome, BBC.


“Prime Minister of Singapore receives $1 million pay increase” . You are welcome, BBC.


Did he also employ “one weird trick” in the process of writing this clickbait infested headline?


How deeply . Yes, I am that person on the internet…
Poor Jilanico, it never stops!
And also, thank you for being bold enough to put out new looks as often as you do. You have an appreciative and supportive community here on Lemmy!
Heh! Jilanico, I couldn’t resist, but you know I’m a fan.
Jilanico, the shirt is a little too “Bill Lumbergh from Office Space” for my tastes. Also, you are missing a belt :)


Cutting out the clickbait: “Social media platforms face public ire after fatal crash involving teenagers filming themselves driving on wrong side”
Fellow Scarfolk fans. Brilliant!
Echoes of Scarfolk in the graphic design - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarfolk , https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/?m=1


This should be illegal. Especially when fused with Google’s existing data sets, de-anonymization will be trivial in many cases.

Tried 5.6. Didn’t like it. Specifically, it plunged right into the codebase and started making changes without asking clarifying questions or offering analysis of the problem or any visible explanations, unlike Opus or other frontier models. Disconcerting.


Leeds. What’s this clickbaity headline writing, BBC?

A classic on this subject from The Onion, Franz Kafka International Airport: https://youtu.be/gEyFH-a-XoQ


Ah! Pretty sure that’s a stilling well to measure the river stage:
https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/stilling-wells-have-been-used-historically-measure-river-stage
https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands//wmm/chap06_07.html
I don’t think there’s enough pattern contrast between the shirt and tie in this outfit. The rule I always heard was to have a wide pattern and a narrow one. In this case, the tie is vanishing into the pinstripes of the shirt.


I am an unusual consumer of YouTube content, with interests that go in many different directions. All of these folks are likeable, have been going for a really long time and know their topics intimately:
Thus, in no particular order, YouTubers I like are:
Enes Yilmazer (luxury real estate / mansion walkthroughs): https://youtube.com/@enesyilmazer
Aquaholic (boats and yachts): https://youtube.com/@aquaholic
The B1M (construction and civil engineering): https://youtube.com/@theb1m
The Bond Experience (Bond, James Bond): https://youtube.com/@thebondexperience
Red Dead Restoration (vintage watch restoration - usually completely silent videos except for ASMR as he restores old watches): https://youtube.com/@reddeadrestoration
Jay Leno’s Garage ('nuff said – in no way an obscure channel, but Jay knows and loves his cars): https://youtube.com/@jaylenosgarage
Hodinkee (watches) - https://youtube.com/@hodinkee
Berliner Philharmoniker (sublime music and orchestral performances) - https://youtube.com/@berlinphil
Bright Sun Films (abandoned buildings, bankrupt companies and other things, usually in a mini-documentary format): https://youtube.com/@brightsunfilms


I’m reading this as an outsider (US) and wondering who the people proposing these policies are, and why they’re so opposed to fun, nightlife, and supporting long-standing traditions? I’ve been to the UK many times and loved the pub scene.
Is this is an anti-alcohol ploy dressed in crime-fighting garb?
Here’s the letter: https://mathandai.org/