![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Fyi: people often take out more than one loan, and leave the lowest interest federal loans for last…
Fyi: people often take out more than one loan, and leave the lowest interest federal loans for last…
I remember. The turbo on my 386 didn’t make it faster. It made non turbo mode slower.
The Court has to know that ruling a former President immune for breaking the law isn’t a viable decision.
Like, it would immediately make any sitting President a king, and supercede the Court’s power.
Which is why they’ll wait, but rule he isn’t immune. Not because it’s the right thing, but because doing otherwise would make the Court less, and they’re selfish fucks that want to be on top.
That’s all well and good, but remember,
concurring opinion
…is what matters at the end of the day.
I think we can all agree Liz (and Jack) are pretty racist.
Standing up in the face of oppression and bigotry is the point.
Because Trump pardoned him.
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/23/949820820/trump-pardons-roger-stone-paul-manafort-and-charles-kushner
I think an “arms race” that forever expands the court – and thus dilutes the individual relevance of a single Justice – is a good thing.
A single Justice dying or retiring should not be the sort of thing to reshape the entire country.
In this case, remembering standing means they don’t have to double down and rule on abortion itself again.
The answer to, “How do I delete someone else’s comment?” turned out to be, “$44 billion.”
my mom mostly stays downstairs and her friend mostly stays upstairs
So you’re saying your mom is a bottom? /s
“Training data”
Altruism is never going to be the way to get companies to do the right thing. Instead, making the wrong thing a financial liability is.
It’s only new-feeling cause it’s been 20-some years since we’ve had a democratic control of most parts of the government.
It’s pretty neat, right?
There are no hard requirements for being president beyond those listed in the Constitution:
That’s it. The framers of the Constitution presumably felt being a convicted felon would be enough for an electorate (or the electoral college, at least) to simply not vote for that person.
History will forget her.
How many people remember stupid congresspeople from 30 years ago?
Imhofe bringing a snowball to the Senate floor, this disproving climate change, for example. You and i and historians might, but average Joe on the street?
Oh no.
Not undermine the legitimacy of the Court!
Those fucksticks did it themselves. Anything the Executive does to put it back on course is an improvement.
then paying off said pornstar to interfere with the election outcomes?
You forgot the most important part: Feloniously classifying those payments as “legal expenses.”
There’s an IDE drive in a landfill somewhere with 10BTC on it because I’m fuckwit.
Biden could trot out as a half-rotten corpse and I’d still vote for him over a serial liar and traitor to our nation.