This sneaky way of getting on the index from day 1 makes me so mad. Are the index funds really contractually required to follow the exchange’s definition of index? I guess they are. It feels skeevy as hell that one company can skirt the rules this way however.
LWer to Big Yud: Please be serious
they’re just jelly Elezier has all the cool hats and gets all the chicksmath pets
This explains a lot. Yud writes in 2018:
[…] it occurred to me that I was pretty much raised and socialized by my parents’ collection of science fiction.
My parents’ collection of old science fiction.
Isaac Asimov. H. Beam Piper. A. E. van Vogt. Early Heinlein, because my parents didn’t want me reading the later books.
And when I did try reading science fiction from later days, a lot of it struck me as… icky. Neuromancer, bleah, what is wrong with this book, it feels damaged, why do people like this, it feels like there’s way too much flash and it ate the substance, it’s showing off way too hard.
And now that I think about it, I feel like a lot of my writing on rationality would be a lot more popular if I could go back in time to the 1960s and present it there. “Twelve Virtues of Rationality” is what people could’ve been reading instead of Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land, to take a different path from the branching point that found Stranger in a Strange Land appealing.
(I just finished re-reading Neuromance, partly because I mined it for quotes here, and I think it still holds up).
So Yud skipped with New Wave SF and the bombastic late 70s stuff that New Wave was partly a reaction to. He jumped into cyberpunk (itself a reaction to both) and bounced off hard.
There’s so much conversation within SF that he’s missing, and it’s kinda important, because his project is an SF project, and he’d probably get more traction if he’d engaged with it more.
Cliff Stoll (author of The Cuckoo’s Egg and maker of real-world Klein bottles) declared dead by AI
Here’s some slobslicker whose stating model collapse is cool actually because human culture also has a bunch of weird quirks
https://davidoks.blog/p/language-models-are-weird-for-the
a surprisingly common defense of GenAI is that “so what if it’s stupid, people are stupid too” well yeah but that’s not the promise is it. The promise is PhDs on tap, not average Facebook poster
“ChatGPT, explain to me why women avoid me like the plague”
Enjoy this masterful account of successful human-ing by a LWer
Surely this suave persuasiveness will soon enable the faithful to convince the unwashed masses of the One True Way
How to ensure your entire pool of addiction attention is directed towards GenAI: take absurd measures to lock down your phone
https://lobste.rs/s/pzx24l/iphone_dumbphone
You don’t need a “browser” when you can ask ChatGPT!
Some more about the term “one-shotted” in the Atlantic, found in a LW comment thread, so caveat emptor
Trust, but verify, and tape a shotgun to their forehead just in case.
edit I vaguely remember the shotgun to the forehead as a reference to the Turing Registry in Gibson’s Sprawl trilogy, but I can’t find a direct quote. Am I totally off base with it?
edit edit found it
“Autonomy, that’s the bugaboo, where your AI’s are concerned. My guess, Case, you’re going in there to cut the hard-wired shackles that keep this baby from getting any smarter. And I can’t see how you’d distinguish, say, between a move the parent company makes, and some move the AI makes on its own, so that’s maybe where the confusion comes in.” Again the nonlaugh. “See, those things, they can work real hard, buy themselves time to write cookbooks or whatever, but the minute, I mean the nanosecond, that one starts figuring out ways to make itself smarter, Turing’ll wipe it. Nobody trusts those fuckers, you know that. Every AI ever built has an electromagnetic shotgun wired to its forehead.”
And why isn’t Yudkowsky advocating for sexy French Turing cops headshotting rogue AIs?
“You are worse than a fool,” Michèle said, getting to her feet, the pistol in her hand. “You have no care for your species. For thousands of years men dreamed of pacts with demons. Only now are such things possible. And what would you be paid with? What would your price be, for aiding this thing to free itself and grow?” There was a knowing weariness in her young voice that no nineteen-year-old could have mustered. “You will dress now. You will come with us. Along with the one you call Armitage, you will return with us to Geneva and give testimony in the trial of this intelligence. Otherwise, we kill you. Now.” She raised the pistol, a smooth black Walther with an integral silencer.
that’s a horrifying situation to be in… good on the community who originally cancelled his show for apologizing
More on Dawkin’s fellating Claude (sorry Claudia)
https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
edit this particular episode has not made it into LW (yet)
Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong decides GenAI is good enough to replace 14% of his shitty company
PR-laden longtweet for source
https://xcancel.com/brian_armstrong/status/2051616759145185723
Showed up first on Lobste.rs (by 42 min by my stats) with the author themselves as a submitter:
most of the discussion is about whether they’re a spammer or a promptfondler.
HN seems more enthusiastic
LW found it too:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/3LcyoqNTJuCZ65MbL/mo-putera-s-shortform?commentId=hBaxokbLP3LEKSKij
Didn’t realize it was on Unherd, that organ for middlebrow fascists
Edit it’s funny how “one-shotted” has object-shifted from the original “Claude one-shotted this code” to “asshole was one-shotted by Claude”
Here’s an account of Elon on the stand
(dunno author, not endorsing their other work)
https://www.hardresetmedia.com/p/musk-v-altman-recapping-elon-musk-farcical-cross-examination
Here’s one post, but it’s obfuscated as usual
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/KwxcunmW33TgvrAmg/red-vs-blue-the-parable-of-the-feud-within-a-feud
One weird thing about LW is that it presents itself as this timeless Hall of Truth, but half the content is literally incomprehensible if you’re not also deeply embedded in the adjacent Twittersphere .
Actually 13.2% had read it in 2016
I take Zitron’s takes with a massive grain of salt, but I think the fundamental difference between him and rats is that for him, AI is just another technology. He’s looking at the figures, seeing the adoption, and not premising his arguments with the supposition that Anthropic’s Claude is literally gonna escape and kill us all.
Piper says she’s fine with paying $100/month for Claude. OK, but how large is the total addressable market for that kind of monthly expenditure - especially in a world where costs are rising? I’ve seen people stating that because they personally spend $200 on streaming services, increasing that load by 50% monthly is no big deal for them. But streaming services are much more mainstream than AI agents, and crucially, adding another subscriber to them is basically zero-cost for the provider on the margin. Not so with AI! The more people use them, the more they cost for the provider!
We’re seeing “pricing adjustments” from both Anthropic and Microsoft, which sure doesn’t align with the idea that they have a huge inference pricing margin cushion. Everything is gonna get more expensive - fuel, chips, employees (who are gonna be expected to be compensated for their own rising costs). Just based on what I’m reading in the news titls the analysis over in Ed’s favor.
Check out this racist complaining that other racists are doing racism wrong
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jqcE8A7ABMAbrJvAn/aporia-magazine-s-selective-hereditarianism