• 2 Posts
  • 192 Comments
Joined 25 天前
cake
Cake day: 2026年8月5日

help-circle

  • To be clear: I’m not suggesting some elections should be thrown, to allow ONP to win some seats or form government. Of course, every election needs to be fought.

    Its more like, the silver lining is that populist governments can’t govern, and in Australia an ONO state government would likely prevent an ONP federal government.

    IDK if I’d call it “analysis”, but I’ll see if I can find the ep. It was recent but there’s a lot of episodes and this wasn’t the main subject.



  • The census matters because it provides data that governments, businesses, and communities use to fund public services, plan infrastructure, and ensure fair political representation.

    I just don’t believe this is true, it’s the PR story delivered by the census team to motivate people to fill it out, but it just doesn’t withstand a moment’s critical thought.

    Governments aren’t building hospitals and schools on the basis of what the census data says, they measure demand at existing facilities.

    There is no government decision which is not better informed by other means.


















  • Because a CEO is a specific thing with a specific meaning that just isn’t relevant here. It’s laden with human meaning that is irrelevant to a statistical model.

    Really you’re trying to say that the bots coordinated their efforts, and perhaps one of them was delegating tasks.

    This type of structure is very common in tech, in load balancers or queues of service workers, containers and hypervisors, et cetera.

    Power structures that seem logical and efficient to humans are not so for a gen AI model. If everyone knows what needs to be done and no one has any ego or character traits to manage, then everyone can simply perform the next task as it arises.

    Its absolutely absurd to suggest that the bots elected a CEO.