Alt account: @merdaverse@lemmy.zip

  • 29 Posts
  • 184 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 20th, 2024

help-circle








  • Yeah, the machines that they smashed had been in use in England for 2 centuries at that point. It’s very unlikely that they just decided to rebel against this 2 century old “new technology” because they were some primitive brutes as they are depicted. History is written by the victors, and in this case capitalists were successful in tarnishing their reputation for centuries.







  • merdaverse@lemmy.worldOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlCommunism is when no food
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Dunno what you’re trying to prove here, apart from “removing an outlier from the data makes the data closer to the average”, which is pretty obvious.

    But you can clearly see that the graph shows Europe, not EU, so using your same calculation with the population of Europe, which is 745 million and excluding France, the result is 1.13.

    Also I don’t see any indication that OurWorldInData is using an average of countries (which would be stupid). Considering their jobs are statistics, they probably know how to aggregate per population, aka a weighted average.



  • merdaverse@lemmy.worldOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlCommunism is when no food
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I see that some people try to attribute this to older population and/or Alzheimer, but even by those metrics the countries above are pretty close and wouldn’t justify such a big gap:

    As for the reliability of data, it’s from a peer reviewed study by an American university. If they had a way to make the China data look worse, I’m sure they wouldn’t hesitate.












  • each employee provides $2.3 million worth of value

    Market cap is just the value at which shares are sold on the market, not necessarily the actual value of the company. It implies a lot speculation for investors on how much they expect to gain from the ownership. The company equity/net worth is a more accurate indicator. What you’re calculating is the accumulated value in time, not yearly.

    If you want the ratio of generated value to wages paid, it’s hard to accurately calculate with just public data, but you can approximate it so: in a given year, take the operating income and divide it by the number of employees. Operating income accounts for overhead expenses like SG&A (Sales General & Admin), which includes things that you can argue are useless (like wages for execs, middle management, and sales), but they also include admin costs like office rents, etc. Then you also have to find the average/median wage of a worker at the company, so the total is:

    yearly value created by a worker = (operating income / n. of workers) + median wage

    You can also do a quick calculation using this tool: https://yourfairshare.info/

    It’s interesting to note how in all of these top companies, for every 1$ paid to workers, another ~1$ is transferred to capitalists through dividends and buybacks.


  • Here’s a site that calculates basically how much you’re being exploited in a company. It’s mostly for American stock exchanges, but if you can find the financial reports of your company you can apply the same method (it’s nicely described).

    https://yourfairshare.info/

    The top comment doesn’t really work, because even if workers pooled the money together, shareholders or execs might refuse to sell their shares if they are expecting it to grow and pay them out more in the future. Buying up companies to turn into coops doesn’t work (except for failing/bankrupt companies), because it takes capital to do that, which workers don’t have by definition.