I guess I go to Guantanamo!

deleted by creator

I’ll do this, thank you!

For the folks in here saying that Mozilla shouldn’t depend on the Google search deal: how much would you be willing to pay for Firefox to make up that $450 million annually? Because that’s your choice: either you pay, Google pays, or advertisers pay.

Good to know, thank you! I too, love boobies

TY! I’ll give that one another look. Can it export .fountain?

This is niche, but I really want a good FOSS screenwriting software that can rival Highland. There are some options like Trelby and others (because the Fountain syntax makes interchangeable screenplay files possible) but right now none of them are as good as Highland. A good alternative could let me finally leave Apple

I want to learn more about this! Searching for "bed backdoor " right now

Send is open source. I believe it’s a fork of Firefox Send

This tool lets you search for all Android e readers that fit your criteria:

https://comparisontabl.es/e-readers/

Agreed. There’s a slight relief here, though: I believe this is the Times Square shuttle train, which only runs back and forth over a few stations and never goes outside. So at least you’re not on this train for long and never missing a view

Folks are asking “Why post this here?” I get the question but I think I also get the OP, as a New Yorker who was surprised to see this ad IRL.

Most of our subway ads are for VC-funded Internet darlings (think: mattresses-by-mail, kitschy underwear, online therapy) or for some aspiring blockbuster movie from an Internet giant.

Until I saw this ad, I had never in my life seen a subway ad for a company I actually used, let alone respected.

Seeing this ad in the wild broke my brain. I have advocated for online privacy for over a decade. I have spent so much energy pushing people to use Signal. But I had never before imagined that “online privacy” was a concept that could find an audience in mass marketing.

I don’t know if Mullvad will take off. But I know that seeing these ads moved me. I felt like maybe, MAYBE, our movement is breaking through.

Cool article but Wired already published this 2 years ago. Wonder why they’re repubbing?

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/car-free-cities-opposition

Yes, that’s all true. But that’s a good argument for “You shouldn’t only vote,” not “You shouldn’t vote.” See the difference?

If the only action we take is voting, then the tyrants who aren’t constrained by law will win. If the only action we take is direct action, then the tyrants win as soon as they outgun us. If we use voting to advance things in civil society inside the lines and direct action to keep the tyrants playing inside the lines, we win.

Not sure how to tell you this, but the Right has spent years and millions of dollars trying to make voting illegal for its opponents.

So… I guess it does change shit, by your definition.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/03/us/politics/trump-voter-rolls.html

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/officials-investigating-why-126000-voters-were-purged-from-ny-rolls

https://www.democracydocket.com/analysis/in-seven-states-removing-voters-from-the-rolls-just-got-easier/