• 0 Posts
  • 172 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 10th, 2024

help-circle








  • multifariace@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldTough choice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    15 days ago

    Apparently putting a huge number of people in jail for minor possession of a drug that is only illegal because of racist 70s politics is spotless, and doing so to support capitalizing the prison system, is spotless. I call it dehumanizing and unconstitutional, but I just care about empirical data that apparently is completely unimportant in tribalist capitalist worshiping countries like the USA.



  • In Florida, I have heard it from way too many people to feel comfortable. Republicans will say how they are ready if Trump loses. They say it’s because there is no way he can lose unless it’s all rigged. They believe this will happen. The worst I heard was a guy saying he will shoot anybody he suspects is not on his team. Others were not quite as ready, but definitely as angry and ignorant with the means. Some of the more intellectual I talk to are quick to point out the flaws of Democrats and how that said is more violent because of all the riots.

    Living here is scary. It would be a war of ignorance, frustration, and hate against a false enemy. It will be a passionate group of clueless rebels without an enemy based in reality. Anyone could become a casualty in the chaos. These people are anti-intellectual, basing everything on what they call “common sense.” What that actually mean is whatever reinforces their anger in the moment is the truth no matter how ignorant or hypocritical.

    It feels too real that citizens will be taking up arms. The worst part is not knowing who they will attack since the enemy is all in their heads.



  • multifariace@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzHoney
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Thank you for the correction. It can be applied in the Socratic method. I ask questions to understand someone’s position and continue into how they came to those conclusions. At no point do I pressure for answers though. The idea is just to keep the person talking so you can understand their poimt of view to the best of your ability. It has a side effect of healthy personal reflection for all parties involved.



  • multifariace@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzHoney
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Just look at the other responses to my comments.

    In real life it can be better or worse. Some of the closest people in my life get immediately defensive. It’s sometimes easier to talk with strangers. More often than not, I will find a passion point that is the limit of conversation. At those times I just listen as much as possible. How much I engage depends on how they rect to my questions.



  • multifariace@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzHoney
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    I was unaware that my message implied a 100% requirement. That part of the comment was meant to be about how I see them trying to define the line between what is vegan and what isn’t. I see now how this is being interpreted and it is my fault for being unclear.


  • multifariace@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzHoney
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    27 days ago

    I am not confused. I am curious and fascinated on how people come to their conclusions. I know exactly what epistomology means. I have used it for conversations with many vegans about their choices as well as on other personally held beliefs. I could be a lot better at it but it has helped me show that I am curious and respectful.



  • multifariace@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzHoney
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    The response to light color does not stand on its own. That is merely one parallel from many. It is true plants do not have a nervous system like animals, but they do have similar responses to stimuli. Parallels can be drawn to sight, sound/touch and smell/taste.

    Sentience is another topic that is defined subjectively. From context it is clear you make a central nervous system a foundational requirement. I could also apply this to technology, so I would need clarification from you to understand what it means to you. I do not hold to a personal definition for sentience because I have found neither a universal nor scientific understanding of the idea.

    As for the last paragraph: yup.