oce 🐆

I try to contribute to things getting better, with sourced information, OC and polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with a point ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.

  • 21 Posts
  • 1.28K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle










  • Norwegians aren’t more environmentally-minded than people elsewhere, she reckons. “I don’t think a green mindset has much to do with it. It has to do with strong policies, and people gradually understanding that driving an electric car is possible.”

    Yet Norway is also a very wealthy nation, which thanks to its huge oil and gas exports, has a sovereign wealth fund worth more than $1.7tn (£1.3tn). This means it can more easily afford big infrastructure-build projects, and absorb the loss of tax revenue from the sale of petrol and diesel cars and their fuel.

    The country also has an abundance of renewable hydro electricity, which accounts for 88% of its production capacity.







  • I’m assuming they both work at same “evil” company.

    Yes

    Did the roof collapse despite numerous warnings from the maintenance staff about structural issues? If the worker failed to report outside the company, yes there is some fault on them for inaction.

    Let’s say there is no issue regarding maintenance, everything is safe, the building technician is only “guilty” of helping an “evil” company run.

    If the company ordered some cyrpto mining baked into their software, then the developer who accepted the task and implemented it would share guilt.

    So it’s more about directly working on something bad?
    I guess that means people working directly on the chain of personal data exploitation at the tech giants are more guilty.