If it’s fake, then that still matches how consent works to people like Doe 174
^ guy who thought the Apple Newton would catch on as-was
Maybe it was a convoluted way of breaking the news that Neil Gaiman is a sex pervert
I agree completely, no normal person wants that.
*clicks on another tree in my 6,000 hour Old School RuneScape account*
IGN and its consequences have been a disaster for video game journalism.
“This game barely works. I had multiple game-breaking bugs during the tutorial. The art style is ugly, the music is annoying, the gameplay is generic and not fun at all, the graphics stutter constantly, and it tried to make me drink a can of mountain dew on camera to verify my purchase. We give it a 7… point 1.”
If your name was your mother’s maiden name followed by your bank password, what would your new name be?
Hopefully Tubular updates soon too
One of the countless reasons we need to repeal the DMCA and change copyright expiration to set in after 25 years
West Taiwan isn’t going to love you, give it up
This has been my weekly reminder that there are people who use Bing. Harrowing.
Isn’t it easier to just jump the turnstiles?
This was the entire point. If you loan out money that immediately gets paid to construction firms you own, you’re effectively just charging people (with interest) to be neocolonialized.
Thanks for correcting that, my browser rejects most redirects so I didn’t know there was an issue.
Downvotes don’t work on Beehaw
#STOP! YOU VIOLATED THE LAW! PAY THE COURT A FINE, OR FACE YOUR SENTENCE. YOUR STOLEN GOODS ARE NOW FORFEIT.
Then I guess maybe don’t be dogshit at assuming, skill issue
Yeah, I get it. Here’s the thing though, this specific part:
I also have autism and some people with the condition aren’t as good as me at putting together the connotations of words AND the overall post to figure out the poster’s intentions. And some people aren’t terminally online and have less exposure to seeing this word used. They’ve likely overwhelmingly seen it used as a pejorative, and end up very skeptical of this post.
Those people all have one thing in common: nobody put a gun to their head and said “what’s going on with this post? Make the call and post your comment NOW”. One thing all we here on the internet do all have in common is the ability to read, and to use our sapience to make decisions about what we read. To say “this seems out of line. Could it be what I think it is, or am I assuming?” By process of elimination, a person either chooses to do that, or chooses to be assumptive. And also:
I don’t like the idea that people like me, or that people who might have reasonably arrived at a different conclusion about this, are being told that they’re huge dorks who need to go outside.
There is no reasonable way to get to the wrong conclusion.
Ever.
If you’re being reasonable, you either find the right conclusion beyond all reasonable doubt, or you concede that you don’t have enough information and then move on with your life. The only way to get to the wrong conclusion is to jump to conclusions, because being reasonable requires you to start from the point of “there may be no answer I can find”. The people in this thread who got it wrong made assumptions, jumped to conclusions, and defended themselves by being belligerent. That is a fundamental lack of respect for others’ intelligence that goes beyond being rude to people and using mean words.
Their motivation essentially boils down to “We have to separate them to protect women from the terrifying power of the superior male intellect”.
Oh yeah you’re right we should just not even bother voting and let the right wing win.