What about devious prunes?
Ex-tanker turned programmer
もと戦車乗り員;現在プログラマー
English is good, Japanese is okay
英語は普通、日本語はそこそこ
I love puns!
ダジャレ大好き!
What about devious prunes?
I wish I could be in meetings that productive and pleasant ;_;
It took me like four episodes to realize
“notsu” is an anagram of “tsuno”
As we are certified trash people, Shikanoko Nokonoko Koshitantan. It’s absolutely stupid but we love it.
We’ve been watching a lot of “comfort” shows this season. As others have mentioned, Slime S3 is like the comfort anime of board room meetings - lots of exposition, but it is moving things along and these characters have all been well established already so it’s like hanging out with friends.
Laid-back Camp S3 was decidedly light on “Camp” but really brought its “Laid-back” game.
Dead Dead Demon’s Dededede Destruction is a weird mix of Satoshi Kon, Mamoru Oshii, and slice-of-life that we’re totally into. It also reminds us a bit of last year’s amazing Heavenly Delusion (when is that getting another season!?)
Just started the most recent Demon Slayer arc, looks good so far, and the new Netflix season of Kimi ni Todoke, which is excellent even if we keep forgetting each episode is an hour long.
Horrific civilian death toll as the IDF “mistakenly” bombs the very safe zones where they told people to go in 3, 2, 1…
You’re doing Lord Baphomet’s work here, but I think I’m good. Thanks though!
Back in 2006/2007 I was reading Slashdot for tech news and stuff. I started noticing that a lot of newer content was just linking to Reddit posts, so I figured I’d cut out the middleman and jumped ship to Reddit.
How dare you directly call out Fafner in the Azure in this manner!?
Also forgot Kenichi Ogata and Hochu Otsuka!
You guys sure pronounce “Mu La Flaga” weird…
Crap, I was going to write Tsuda-san and Hayami Saori but got distracted by video clips! -_-;
Other male actors I can pretty much instantly recognize:
Some female VAs I can spot regularly, although I have a harder time here as many female VAs have excellent ranges:
Yeah, have you tried just… being @rosymind@leminal.space ? Their experience is obviously superior, why would you want to be anybody else? /s
I’ve been listening to “Blowback” and, like, duh.
New season announced, comic volume 9 next month: it’s a good season.
Somewhere out there a vending machine is crying its metal heart out
Doubtful; A) that would cause rust, and B) it’d have to pay to get that capability in the first place!
Honestly, I had zero expectations of Vending Machine but it’s mildly exceeded them. Way better than it has any right to be.
I found out just a few years ago that many earthworms are invasive species in North America: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasive_earthworms_of_North_America.
Apparently the last ice age cleared out all the earthworms north of the 49th, and existing native species didn’t migrate back after the glaciers receded, leaving many northern and west-coast forests without earthworms at all.
Other folks had covered the wing aspect, I wanted to discuss the engine portion. Both are cogent.
This part is half-right: the work of the engine is going to accelerating the plane forward, or (when thrust and drag are in equilibrium) maintaining the current velocity. But in level flight, the engine is not “keeping the plane in the air” - it is impossible for it to contribute to lift directly because it’s force vector is 90 degrees from the lift vector.
Therefore, some of the engine’s energy is going into keeping the plane in the air, and some is going into accelerating it forwards, or keeping it at the same speed (fighting air resistance).
This is where you make an unsupported leap:
Therefore, if the plane points straight up, the engine should be able to support it hovering in the air. If it didn’t have enough power to fight gravity when pointing straight up, it wouldn’t have enough power to fight gravity when moving horizontally, either.
A car can accelerate horizontally because its engine can rotate its tires to apply horizontal force due to friction and mechanical advantage; does that mean it can drive straight up a wall? Of course not (outside of some specialized bouldering vehicles). The engine lacks the power to lift the car straight up, and the tires lack the grip to hold on to a vertical surface. The drivetrain is designed for efficient road cruising, not high power and grip
It’s the same for aircraft, generally: a given engine usually has enough power to accelerate the aircraft horizontally, and applies this through some kind of prop or jet rotor. But this combination is tuned for efficient cruising, not vertical climbing. The engine won’t provide enough power, and the prop can’t move enough air, to sustain vertical flight indefinitely.
“But Sleet01,” you cry, “helicopters exist!” Just so! They trade cruise efficiency for vertical thrust by greatly increasing the size of the prop, increasing the mechanical advantage so that less engine power is needed to hover or climb vertically. That’s like putting 4" wheels covered in suction cups on your car - now it can go straight up, but you can’t go very far or very fast!
“But Sleet01,” you exclaim, “F-15s exist and can fly vertically almost to space!” Indeed they do, but in order to fly an F-15 vertically you need to burn immense amounts of fuel, almost 400 gallons per minute. That’s like putting two turbo V8s in your Jeep - now you have the power to go vertical, but only for a couple minutes!
Is this the part of Russia that Russia invaded and annexed from Ukraine originally?