Yes. Am not robot.

  • 2 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2023

help-circle















  • Most people are still using Java 8 (including android)…

    Surveys don’t seem to back this up any more… Yes there’s a lot of Java 8 code. But more and more of it is maintenance rather than new development. Respondents of surveys that are able to list the versions they use in production (vs ‘pick one’) have indicated that for many teams with exposure to Java 8, they also have newer versions in production - showing that Java 8 is increasingly about maintenance than ongoing development (with the blocks to moving forward being a mix economic and technical factors).

    The most dominant frameworks in the industry are ending their support for Java 8 - so not too far down the track, staying on Java 8 will mean that while you can pay for platform support, framework support is going to disappear anyway.

    …we are currently at ~java 20.

    Yes Java 20 is the current release, with Oracle’s LTS being Java 17 (the previous ones being 17, 11 and 8 - with 8 having the largest paid support window).

    Java 21 is out in a couple of weeks and will become the new Oracle LTS (other vendors and frameworks tend to align on this LTS designation so it continues to be important).




  • Here in NZ, we have a sub-handful of places where 110 is allowed, the rest is mostly 100 with more and reduced to 80, 70, 60 or 50 (in places that used to be 100).

    To be fair, a great deal of our roadway is not up to safe use at 100 (though I do disagree with where that dividing line is placed).

    Unfortunately I think that reducing the limits on unsafe surfaces and roading layout is now seen as a permanent solution. Any mitigation mechanism like that should be coupled with at some publicly visible prioritisation to resolve it.

    Alas with our small population and relatively large roading network I doubt it’s getting better for us any time soon.

     

    Hey you. Over the ditch. I feel your pain and hope you have better luck.




  • If we’re talking adaptation, then ‘centuries’ is fairly irrelevant given how long our generations are…

    Also, hasn’t it really only been a small number of centuries where reading has become a regular and critical function for the majority of the population?

    Combine that with the fact that it’s long been easier/cheaper to make a uniformly light-coloured ‘paper’ and dark ink, than the reverse.

    Using our history of dark-text might just be allowing the technology of the times to drive the future.

     

    A more interesting comparison might be that we started with dark displays and light text (amber and green-screens) and moved to white displays with dark text later on.

    Was that change due to a desire to mimic the paper medium?

    Was it down to the quality of displays at the time (light bleed on CRTs might have driven this flip from dark to light once uniformity and brightness reached useful levels)?

    Or was it because more people prefer dark text over light?

     

    Regardless I’d like to finish by virtually girding my loins, brandishing my digital spear, and warning everyone that they’ll have to pry dark-mode from my cold-dead hands.