Admin of Europe Pub
- Lemmy: @tfm@europe.pub
- PieFed: @tfm@piefed.europe.pub
- 1.11K Posts
- 568 Comments
  391·2 months ago 391·2 months ago- I’m pretty happy with engagement in the Fediverse. 
  2·2 months ago 2·2 months ago- Awesome! 
  21·2 months ago 21·2 months ago- True 
  24·2 months ago 24·2 months ago- Lemmy has about 40,000 monthly active users. Lemmy.world accounts for about 15,500 of that. That’s about 40%. 
  8·2 months ago 8·2 months ago- This site currently measures the concentration of user data for active users: in the Fediverse, this data is on servers (also known as instances); in the Atmosphere, it is on the PDSes that host users’ data repos. All PDSes run by the company Bluesky Social PBC are aggregated in this dataset, since they are under the control of a single entity. Similarly, mastodon.social and mastodon.online are combined as they are run by the same company. 
  10·2 months ago 10·2 months ago- True 
  472·2 months ago 472·2 months ago- So why does everyone keep referring to Bluesky as decentralized or even comparable to the fediverse - They call it marketing, I call it propaganda. 
  16·2 months ago 16·2 months ago- PDSes only store user data. These are full instances that can be used to browse the network. The idea is to make your account really yours. Bluesky is hosting most of them. But there are some people who do it on their own. - But bluesky controls much more important components in the network, namely the Relay and AppView. - If Bluesky decides to cut off your PDS you are pretty much alone. - Bluesky is pretty much a centralized platform like Twittler. 
  31·2 months ago 31·2 months ago- I suppose PDS instances are included: https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds 
- Where and how much money comes from you? 
- Let’s not forget that’s devices sold per year. If you replace all iphones, that’s about 3 billion I think. This number looks a lot different. - Comparing this to global energy production is not really helpful, in my opinion. 
- Let’s do the math. Apple sells about about 200 million devices a year. Let’s say they remove the charging port and completely rely on wireless charging, which isn’t completely unrealistic. If we use your 30wh this would result in 6.96GWh or lost energy every single day. With 150wh it would be 34.8GWh. - If that’s not significant for one dumb decision I don’t know what is. 
- Wireless charging is a waste of energy 
- Yeah and then they evade taxes 
- Windows is the best window manager! 
  11·2 months ago 11·2 months ago- This is dumb on a different level 
  9·2 months ago 9·2 months ago- That would be too obvious 





















Power dispenser