• Smookey4444@anarchist.nexusEnglish
    1·
    6 days ago

    You could start by trying to resolve any conflict that would lead to that in the first place. But if you mean do it just because you feel like it then the community could require you to make reparations or something like that. If that still didn’t work you could be kicked out of the community

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          1·
          4 days ago

          Until the first person realizes that if they can sway 51% of the community, they can oppress the other 49%. Technically everyone has an equal vote, but one person definitely wields more power. It’s just mob rule, whoever is most persuasive is in charge.

          • Smookey4444@anarchist.nexusEnglish
            0·
            3 days ago

            Interestingly enough what you just described is a democracy, the socalled system that gives people power. Anarchist societies would be by consensus

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  1·
                  2 days ago

                  People have conflicting wants. I want to live in the nice riverside plot, so do other people. I want the streets to be brick, other people want cobblestone. I want the town square to be a green space, other people want it to be a playground.

                  Sometimes different parts of the community want mutually exclusive things. All of political and economic theory ultimately comes down to how to negotiate disagreements about how to do things. You’re not going to get unanimous consent on anything of substance in a group of more than a dozen people or so.