𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agoI'd pay good money to see this parodyi.pinimg.comimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1361arrow-down17
arrow-up1354arrow-down1imageI'd pay good money to see this parodyi.pinimg.com𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squaregjoel@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up36·2 months agoShould have kept a Sean bean in there unchanged.
minus-squareSomeonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoI’d much prefer to see Bean Bean instead.
minus-squarehemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoThere’s no boromir in the image
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoIt’s Schrödinger’s Bean. We won’t know who is playing Boromir until we observe. This way it can be funny both ways at the same time.
Should have kept a Sean bean in there unchanged.
I’d much prefer to see Bean Bean instead.
There’s no boromir in the image
That’s the problem.
It’s Schrödinger’s Bean. We won’t know who is playing Boromir until we observe.
This way it can be funny both ways at the same time.