Do you know how often bourgeois democracies elect “socialists”? Hell, many of them even elect “communists” on the regular. It’s normal. Get over it. Please.

EDIT - there are basically two main genres of Mamdani poster, both of which keep scrawling MAMDANI on the wall in their own excrement for different reasons, and they all seem to be assuming I am from the other side lol

        • hello_hello [undecided, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Shitty statements on geopolitics which include but may not be limited to:

          • manufacturing consent for a war with Venezuela
          • playing defense for genocide by telling people to not say “globalize the intifada” (which people don’t say its entirely hasbara)
          • promoting hardcore Zionists into his team.

          Genocide defending and imperialism is fine as long as he makes new yorkers pay less rent for a while.

              • Hyper_red [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                It is not possible for a democrat to be better than Zohran. Zohran is a democrat. He is doing things which are expected of him.

                I think the people here who are being accused of liking him only like him slightly more than other democrats

                nobody here is a giant zohran stan

                • SickSemper [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Sorry, did you see the same thread when he was elected about how important a watershed it was? We have paid employees who knew the man personally on this site, some people have certainly elevated him above the imperialist warmonger we understand all democrats to be

                  • Hyper_red [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I think its proof Americans, espically younger Americans are no longer scared of red scare propaganda. Which is good

                    But IDK if many people think he’s gonna do a communism

                    I also did not see that thread

                • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It is not possible for a democrat to be better than Zohran. Zohran is a democrat. He is doing things which are expected of him.

                  This is true. Based on past conversations I’ve seen here, I think you’re underestimating how much some people here like him. I could make this exact same post about AOC or Bernie and it would be completely uncontroversial.

                  • Hyper_red [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I have literally only seen this post go “ERM I WANT IT ON THE RECORD THAT ZOHRAN WILL BETRAY EVERYONE!” and then nobody in the comments disagree

                    And its posted like once a week

                    its fucking annoying. I don’t care about him I live in Ireland.

                    What if I posted about random Irish politicians I disliked? I think the people living in America would find it just as fucking annoying

                    michael healy are IS THE WORST EVER I FUCKING HATE GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

              • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                not at a level of prominence where the Obama phone call comes. We could generate a few Sawants. Maybe some cryptocommunists at less prominent offices, but we’d all hate them because of the fundamental compromises that come with being an elected official. This is just redundant criticism of electoralism and entryism. he won an executive position, let’s save it for when he’s in office not accomplishing anything and it’s useful agitprop.

                • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  he won an executive position, let’s save it for when he’s in office not accomplishing anything and it’s useful agitprop.

                  If we support someone and get them into office, then wait for everyone to realize that that person is bad or inadequate to make criticisms, people will accurately view us as opportunists and hypocrites. Good agitprop requires people to realize that those making it have always known better than Zohran. Materialists can see that Zohran’s approach is not a solution and they’re right to say so.

                  I’m not even sure we fundamentally disagree that much on this, to be honest. You’re right that entryism is a dead strategy. That’s also what I think about Zohran. Truthfully I think that’s all there really is to say about him on Hexbear unless he’s in the news, but some people seem to disagree because I can’t stop hearing about him on here and it’s always arguments.

                  I’m tired of hearing about the mayor-elect. The fact that this always turns into a 100 comment thread of arguments is an embarrassing testament to the overall state of theoretical and historical understanding on this website, as well as its tendency towards US-centrism and at times (though not that often, thankfully) even chauvinism. If this place had a principled “line” on Zohran, these threads would still exist, but they’d have 5 comments at most.

                  Edit: this came out more doomer about the site than I meant it to. This place is good a lot of the time and a much better space than anywhere else online. However, there are a few persistent brainworms that have survived from all the way back in the CTH days.

        • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          When the entire so-called “American left” gets behind candidates who say these things, it manufactures consent for sanctions and interventions among the people that think of themselves as “leftists” and among the rest who think “see, even the loony left knows these brown people are evil”.

          If his influence were confined to the single city, I wouldn’t be hearing about him constantly. Since I’m not from New York, I care about his laundering of imperialism much more than anything he might do as mayor.

          • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            since when does the opinion of the american people matter? and normies are like 2:1 against fucking venezuela because there hasn’t been a 9/11 to get us to the rabid levels of support invading iraq had at the time.

            fuck zohran for that, but i don’t think it changed public opinion at all, and public opinion on foreign affairs doesn’t matter to trump or the rest of the federal government or the capitalists anyway.