Do you know how often bourgeois democracies elect “socialists”? Hell, many of them even elect “communists” on the regular. It’s normal. Get over it. Please.

EDIT - there are basically two main genres of Mamdani poster, both of which keep scrawling MAMDANI on the wall in their own excrement for different reasons, and they all seem to be assuming I am from the other side lol

  • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.netEnglish
    13·
    2 months ago

    soc dems and dem socs are the same thing, they both accomplish the same thing of keeping capitalism in place

    True only in the first world, and only really after the early 20th century.

    I don’t think anyone disagrees with the post I think people are annoyed its posted once a week.

    People definitely disagree, otherwise it would fall off the front page with 5 comments every time it gets posted. People who aren’t interested in hearing about it would mostly just ignore it if the criticism of Mamdani didn’t bother them. I’m also tired of hearing about it, as you say.

    But I could have missed it

    I think so. Its easy to miss threads on here. The defense of Mamdani was A LOT more obvious a few months ago, people mostly argue and defend him indirectly now because he’s shown his ass so many times. However, you can tell who still likes him because they’re the same people who openly defended him when he first got controversial on here.

    As I have said before, for users in New York, you can have your chauvinist mayor and he can improve your life a bit. That’s OK. But you should at the very least acknowledge that he’s a chauvinist and accept that people hate him because of that. And those people, especially if they aren’t Americans, have a right to do so.