• nostrauxendar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wait, what’s the “under a hex (44)” from? He was 55.

    Also I get 79 for “murder”, where did you get 38? And for “Call of Duty”? I don’t know shit about Numerology honestly lol

      • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Have you considered why “Call of Duty” is 38 in Reduction, Single Reduction, KV Exception, and SKV exception?

        Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that all of those ciphers having the same mappings for all letters except K, S, and V… Each of which don’t appear in the phrase “Call of Duty”.

        “The nimble red fox ran around the lazy dog” is 38 in Reduction, Single Reduction, KV Exceptuon, and SKV Exception!!! This means it’s related to murder! And I didn’t even have to calculate the cipher at all, I just had to look at it and see if it had the right letters!

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do your evidence that this was a murder is limited only to something that even crystal healers would consider crack pot?

      • nostrauxendar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thanks for those cyphers! Is it common to use a bunch of different ones in numerology? :o

        But where’s “hex” coming from? I’m sure other words equal 44 too. Does “hex” equal 44 in the cyphers you use?

        When you say that Call of Duty was chosen, what do you mean? He was a developer for that series, and it’s his most popular work so it’s where most people would know him from.

          • nostrauxendar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It sounds like some of those ciphers have big overlap, like the reduction ciphers. Do you factor that in when you’re using them? I think another commenter mentioned that using multiple reduction and exception ciphers that exclude letters not used in the phrase you’re analysing will obviously give you the same results, which seems like a good point to me