• purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    I apologize for being a hipster, but I find it baffling how people treat the recent releases as shocking except how he openly disparaged MeToo (which was a bit surprising to me and certainly awful). He already was asked about Epstein and said “It’s none of your business,” among other ridiculous things. It was already obvious even looking only at the Epstein stuff which side he was on (to say nothing of his being a shitbag for over 50 years even without the Epstein stuff).

    • CommCat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s more surprising was how chummy he was with people he supposedly opposed to the core, like Bannon. Vijay Prishard, in his article on Counterpunch, once even asked Chomsky if he would ever meet with Kissinger, and Chomsky told him “No”, but he has no problem with meeting War Criminal Ehud Barak. Just shows Chomsky’s ideas were never really a threat to the ruling elites, he opposes direct action, and every election cycle he tells his fans to vote Dems.

    • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      It kinda shouldn’t be baffling though.

      We don’t know these people personally, most of us don’t obsessively follow the statements made by these people, and out only mental touchpoint is a reference to a narrow body of their work from the entirety of their lifetime.

      Outside of “Manufacturing Consent” and some “free speech” documentaries that had clips of a speech or talk, it takes people harping on these “revelations” to either keep reminding us filthy casuals that some of our potential faves (Chomsky) … shouldn’t.

  • Sabbo [it/its]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why would anyone be surprised by Chom Chom being a piece of shit?

    He was known as an “Authority of Anarchism” which frankly sounds like a shitpost tagline. I swear, every time there’s a prominent “anarchist” that turns out to be a POS (not the anarchist rapper, that guy’s chill) we have this discourse.

    If they are in a position of authority then they are not a real anarchist!

    It’s like a vegetarian claiming they care about animals! You don’t care about animals, you just find the aesthetic compelling!