• Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Empathy is luxury. If you don’t have food you will not care. Morals is the thing that stops you.

    • gezero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      If religion is what stops you from doing bad things, please don’t ever give it up.

      In my hitchsperience “it takes religion for a decent human to commit atrocities”.

      • Melobol@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like how a comment about religion being the foundation of morality historically - makes people believe that I am bashing atheist people

        • gezero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          People just like to “correct” others…

          For instance I think religion is historically the foundation of immorality. A practice used to exclude, hate, opress, kill and worse.

          If god told you to go and kill a child, would you do it ?(1 Samuel 15:3)

            • themurphy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Witch hunting was done by the people, not power hoarders, and I’m pretty sure that was plain out evil with the excuse of religion.

              • Melobol@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                You are actually agreeing with my point. Religion is being used for morals by the ruling class:v so it is a foundation for society and morals. Morals are not good or evil they are norms accepted by the ruling class or biggest group in society.

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can’t have food, and in result act egocentrically, disadvantaging others and still feel bad about it. Having empathy does not necessitate acting on it.

      • Melobol@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No you won’t have empathy towards your enemies when you don’t have the luxury to do so.
        How many conflicts are going on right now where religion and local society is killing ‘others’ without any mercy?
        Do you think those brain washed massses can waste to feel emphatic towards the enemy that is ‘evil’, ‘bad’ or ‘unclean’ and deserved to be killed?
        If they would - they freaking would stop all these friggin wars. Morality wins - and morality still not a good thing.

        • Zacryon@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          No you won’t have empathy towards your enemies when you don’t have the luxury to do so.

          I don’t see how ‘luxury to do so’ should disprove my point.

          Regarding the rest:
          While I agree with the underlying sentiment, I wouldn’t go so far as to generalize entire population groups and claim they do not feel empathy, even if they kill others. Also: This is drifting a bit beyond what I wanted to point out, therefore I won’t go into more detail.