• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 个月前

        yeah but even in that case, the CEO of the first company has a fiduciary duty to make that company make as much money as possible. intentionally crashing one company sothat other companies’ stock goes up is a gross violation of duty and can and will be punished as such assuming there’s any shareholders who only own shares of the first company.

        • Janx@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 个月前

          Has anyone ever been prosecuted or punished for breach of fiduciary duty? My understanding is that it’s a noble concept, but absolutely toothless.

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 个月前

            i’m not sure. what does happen often is that CEOs are forced to step back by the shareholders. but i’m not sure what exactly the consequences of that are.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 个月前

        yeah good point actually. however you need to differentiate between grid operators and electricity suppliers. the grid is often a monopoly, while many electricity producers feed into the grid. so no, in fact, in most places, electricity supply is not a monopoly at all. in most countries, electricity is traded over 100s of kilometers. so even remote generators can produce electricity and feed it into your city.