cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/52903710

Since Microsoft owns Github, Gitlab is Corp owned now since 2022, why are so many who preach privacy or using Linux, etc, still using a MS product?

Genuine questions. I’m assumming either familiarity & simplicity with GH or difficulty migrating elsewhere?

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Because there hasn’t been enough discomfort to disrupt established workflows yet.

    I remember when Sourceforge hit that tipping point. Microsoft and Gitlab likely do too.

  • 5ymm3trY@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I am not really the target of your question, because I am not a developer of something in particular. I mainly use git to backup and track my Linux and Docker config. There are a few unfinished side-projects as well, but nothing really interesting. I personally chose Gitlab over Codeberg mainly because of the ability to create private repos. The repos don’t contain any private info but I don’t saw any real benefit for the general public either. However, this decision was a couple of years ago.

    As of late, I want to use git also for other stuff that potentially contains data I am not willing to share. Therefore I want to setup my personal Forgejo instance. I like the idea of Codeberg. My goal is to host everything I really want to keep private on my personal instance and move everything else to Codeberg.

    • Voxel@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago
      1. Codeberg allows you to make private repos.
      2. They don’t like being used as external storage, as this is not what they’re providing this service for to the community. I think the same applies to GitHub and Gitlab, that using them as a external storage is not very ethical and may violate the ToS.
      3. A personal Forgejo instance for duch purposes would be a good idea.