so we definately have a viewpoint difference that cannot be resolved. If you think rich or poor a rapist is treated the same you definately look at the world through different glasses. I don’t see much point at more discourse.
I mean I don’t mean to extend this but you know you could have stated the same sooner. You did not have to wait for me to decide we simply don’t see eye to eye. Im not arguing the point anymore but I find your “Finally” comment to be wierd.
I’m not really interested in being the one to back down from facts like rape statistics in the face of men who want to downplay how we treat rapists in our society.
Clearly you didn’t because you came back to continue the conversation even though you “don’t see much point at more discourse.”
I know I didn’t have to wait for you to realize we don’t see eye to eye. That’s not a good enough reason for me to abdicate my responsibility to victims and the facts about rape.
im not evaluating the discussion anymore im evaluating you. you had the bizzaro reply which then continued with a ironically tough guy manosphere type continuance. you are trying to bring it back to the topic that we disagree on. Im literally questioning the way you are doing things at this point.
You persistently tried downplaying rape in order to blame this scenario on class war instead.
I can express exasperated relief when you finally realize that I’m not falling for your view that rapists not being punished is only a problem in the ruling class.
It’s not my problem that you took issue with my expression of relief when you’re finally out of my inbox replies with your rape denials.
The special privilege is being a man and a rapist, not that he’s rich.
Rapists across the board don’t see much jail time at all. Poor or rich.
Stop trying to downplay our society’s issues with rape.
so we definately have a viewpoint difference that cannot be resolved. If you think rich or poor a rapist is treated the same you definately look at the world through different glasses. I don’t see much point at more discourse.
Finally.
I mean I don’t mean to extend this but you know you could have stated the same sooner. You did not have to wait for me to decide we simply don’t see eye to eye. Im not arguing the point anymore but I find your “Finally” comment to be wierd.
I’m not really interested in being the one to back down from facts like rape statistics in the face of men who want to downplay how we treat rapists in our society.
so you think I backed down???
Clearly you didn’t because you came back to continue the conversation even though you “don’t see much point at more discourse.”
I know I didn’t have to wait for you to realize we don’t see eye to eye. That’s not a good enough reason for me to abdicate my responsibility to victims and the facts about rape.
im not evaluating the discussion anymore im evaluating you. you had the bizzaro reply which then continued with a ironically tough guy manosphere type continuance. you are trying to bring it back to the topic that we disagree on. Im literally questioning the way you are doing things at this point.
You persistently tried downplaying rape in order to blame this scenario on class war instead.
I can express exasperated relief when you finally realize that I’m not falling for your view that rapists not being punished is only a problem in the ruling class.
It’s not my problem that you took issue with my expression of relief when you’re finally out of my inbox replies with your rape denials.