Normally you only get a certain number of rejections to prevent dragging out the process. So if being “against Ice” is structural bias, while being “pro ice” counts against your three or whatever rejections…the jury will be pro ice.
Huh, every single state court system does things differently so maybe there was no limit in your case, but there is definitely a limit in federal trials, see Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 24, part (b) here - https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_24 (arc)
Both the defence and prosecution can reject jurors. So defence could reject anyone who supports ICE
Normally you only get a certain number of rejections to prevent dragging out the process. So if being “against Ice” is structural bias, while being “pro ice” counts against your three or whatever rejections…the jury will be pro ice.
I’ve been on a jury. There was no limit to the number of rejections. It took them days to pick a jury.
Huh, every single state court system does things differently so maybe there was no limit in your case, but there is definitely a limit in federal trials, see Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 24, part (b) here - https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_24 (arc)