• AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you don’t care about desktop adoption and the synergy effect on the overall desktop software, then no, it doesn’t have to be easy lol. All right then, keep your secrets.

    I do think certain “elitist” attitudes bleed into the technical decision making. Programmers tend to see the beauty in the system architecture and it becomes it’s own value.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Be that as it may, FOSS tends to be a meritocracy and it takes some skill to contribute to it. Contributors are driven by seeking solutions to their own problems. There’s no incentive to cater to any particular user demographic. There’s a big gap between those programmers in their ivory towers and any practical application.

      That gap is filled by commercial interests. And in this particular market, the PC desktop, there’s a company called Microsoft with huge resources and a vested interest in not allowing any competition. For 20 years now nobody has managed to break their stranglehold on the PC desktop. Companies like Apple and Google managed to bypass the problem by creating completely new, alternative platforms.

      The elitism of a handful of nerds is the least of the issues preventing Linux on the desktop.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes and architects tends to see beauty in buildings, gardeners in gardens, chefs in cooking.