- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- globalnews@lemmy.zip
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- globalnews@lemmy.zip
cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/67405919
The US basically already had unrestricted access to put up military installations on Greenland.
As a Swede, I’d rather not have a war with the US. But if it comes down to it, I’m in full support of Denmark and Greenland.
Our submarines would sink any US fleet: https://www.19fortyfive.com/2026/02/sweden-sank-a-u-s-navy-aircraft-carrier-how-one-wargame-showed-how-americas-supercarriers-can-be-beaten/
As an American, if it comes down to it, I’m in full support of Denmark and Greenland.
Everytime the US is talking about invading Greenland, I see big French navy support vessels (likely for their submarines) stopping over here in the harbour on what is likely their way to Greenland. Speculation of course, but it seems the French are quite serious about their military support to the Danish.
Likewise as a Dutch person. All solidarity with you lot. I think we must back our words with force. We must ramp up our military defense against the US; and to avoid a military-industrial complex, we must ensure that this defense and its industry is nationalised, not in private hands.
Greenland existing has been a clear and present danger requiring urgent action for centuries now.
Spends 90min talking to putin I think I should talk about invading my allies again!
right, because americans need lessons on imperialism /s
There is a noticeable difference to America’s aggressiveness since Putin placed his Manchurian candidate in the White House. While the US has certainly acted in an imperialistic fashion in the recent past, it was nowhere near as blunt, callous and, for lack of a better word, “Russian-style”.
America hegemony was built predominantly on the basis of soft power instead of occupying territory long-term. Coca Cola, Levi’s jeans and rock and roll, combined with skillful diplomacy, consistent foreign policy between Republican- and Democratic-led administrations and a backing of unparalleled hard power projection capabilities was a winning combination in the second half of the 20th century.
Threatening to annex the territory of close allies in particular would have been unthinkable at any previous point in American history, even when they were fighting Colonial wars (e.g. in the Philippines) or during the most coke-fueled periods of the Cold War, when the CIA seemingly enjoyed a carte blanche, especially in Central and South America.
You know what, I’ll take reheated bullshit over brand new bullshit at this point.



