And would I regret cutting that flap out?

            • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              2 days ago

              You freaking weirdos make me laugh. The health stuff is pretty well documented. Do what you want, but if you are too lazy too look up facts, here’s a little from John Hopkins:

              It is important to learn about the benefits and risks of circumcision. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has found that the health benefits of circumcision are greater than the risks. But the AAP also found that these benefits are not great enough to advise that all newborn babies be circumcised. Parents must decide what’s best for their baby.

              • There is a higher risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) in uncircumcised children. This is more so in babies younger than 1 year old. But the risk for UTI in all children is less than 1%.

              • Newborn circumcision does give some protection from cancer of the penis later in life. But the overall risk of penile cancer is very low in developed countries, such as the U.S.

              • Circumcised kids and adults have a lower risk for some sexually transmitted infections. This includes HIV.

              Honestly, not enough reason to have a strong opinion about either way, but damn people get uptight about stupid shit.

              • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                To be fair even this extract concedes that the medical benefits are barely significant. In general the convention is that you do not encourage a procedure if it does not have significant benefits, especially if it’s irreversible, especially on a subject who cannot consent to it. This one kind of gets the 3 strikes in term of medical ethics.

                That being said it is very low-risk and generally done cleanly so i agree with you that it’s not the humanitarian thing that online circles want to make of it. It’s just one of those medical rituals.

              • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                How about this for an imaginary analogy:

                “Studies found that when teachers are allowed to break the fingers of students who perform poorly, scores improve across all measures.”

                Just because something that is unethical has practical benefits does not make it ethical.

                • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It’s like you can’t read. Crazy. Or like you want to compare it to female genital mutilation which it isn’t even close to. I’m going to go out on a limb, and I’m happy to be wrong, but do you have an issue with childhood vaccinations? Just seems like it would fit your…uhh…cognition patterns.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 days ago

    Outside flaps are for wind and water resistance. Inside flaps are to prevent snagging and abrasion.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    It catches the flap, the underwear, your pubes, or your skin. Your choice.

    Obligatory, “How did the berries get above the twig?!”

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’ve clearly got something to figure out for yourself. So just do whatever will help you figure it out. Your answer isn’t online or via other people.

    Go experiment.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, I honestly didn’t consider the flap was protecting me from catching the zipper on the clothing underneath.

      But, that said, the flap is MUCH closer to the zipper than my shirt. So, it’s like:

      With Flap:

      Chance of zIpper catching on shirt: 0%
      Chance of zipper catching on flap: 30%

      Without flap:

      Chance of zIpper catching on shirt: 5% Chance of zipper catching on flap: 0%

      Some experimentation may need to be conducted.

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ah, that makes sense.

    But what if I hotglued a thin piece of plastic or cardboard to that flap so it would be impossible to catch? Probably not great for the laundry machine, but my coats rarely get washed–seem to be rain jackets in particular with this problem.

    • ValiantDust@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      This might be a stupid suggestion, but I have had habits and techniques I just never questioned – if this is a regular problem and not just some few items (some zippers are just shitty, I get that), have you tried changing your technique? Like pulling the end of the zipper down until it’s under a bit of tension with one hand and then pulling the actual zipper thingy away from the flap while closing the zipper with the other hand. That usually works for me.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s a problem with one particular jacket I only wear on occassion. An improvement in zipper pulling skills is a fair suggestion. I’m also considering gluing some slightly stiffer material to the flap.