• atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        This is something that’s likely to hurt a pedestrian though.

        The barrier needs to be higher if cars are able to high center themselves on it. All it takes is one person getting crushed by a vehicle that high centers on that thing. Which clearly nobody thought about when they read my comment.

        Nice assumption guys. Nobody thought about the physics of what happens when that vehicle ends up falling on someone? Not one person looked at the photo in that article and went “what happens to the people who might be in the bike lane on the other side when a vehicle does this”?

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            You aren’t arguing in good faith here. I’m not arguing against the barrier. I’m saying the barrier should be more robust.

            You can feel however you want to feel about this, but I’m betting you saw my original comment and made an assumption about what I meant and now you’re doubling down.

            • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              This was the first time in our thread you’ve mentioned that, so yes I’d agree it could always be safer. You didn’t say that though, you said:

              Viewed as a good thing because nobody has gotten hurt yet.

              Which I and it looks like many others thought you meant you didn’t want the barrier there at all. Need to be clearer if you have a point to make like that.

              • atrielienz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                The second comment made it pretty clear that the barrier height was the problem. But you either didn’t read that or ignored it in favor of arguing. You didn’t ask any questions. You made an assumption and then ignored the further clarification. That’s on you.

                • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  sigh some people will never own up and admit they made a simple mistake. It was a miscommunication man. Just be clear in the future. We aren’t mind readers. If you don’t include information we won’t know about that information.

                  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    14 days ago

                    That you felt so self righteous and aggrieved about that instead of owning your own poor understanding, you chose to downvote. But I’m the one who can’t own up? Sure.