Alien life may not be carbon-based, new study suggests::Self-sustaining chemical reactions that could support biology radically different from life as we know it might exist on many different planets, a new study finds.

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    2 questions:

    Can we eat non-carbon based life forms?

    Can we fuck non-carbon based life forms?

    • NAXLAB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. You can eat them if they have the nutrients you need. Non-carbon-based just means it won’t use carbon as the foundation of its molecular and cellular workings. By mass, there’s relatively little carbon in living organisms and on earth, so whatever’s out there could still use carbon and other elements enough that it has something we could eat. There’s barely any telling what kinds of chemicals will be found in an organism like that, but it could easily be a mix of things we can digest and things we can’t. Even carbon-based life is like that. Wood for example is biologically very similar to us, but is mainly made of cellulose, which we can’t really digest at all.

      2. yes, if it fits.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both of those questions will depend on what kind of environment they need to survive. They might need pressures higher than we can or a pH that would be corrosive to us, or exposure to an chemical that is toxic to us like oxygen was to most life that was around when photosynthesis started producing it.

      If we can make physical contact with it, we’ll be able to eat it. But if it is based on a different chemistry, I doubt there will be much nutritional value for us as our proteins and vitamins are all based on our chemistry. Hell, there’s a good chance we won’t get much nutrition from alien life based on the same chemistry because they might have evolved with a completely different set of proteins that might do things similarly but connect with each other a bit differently. There’s a symmetrical set of proteins that look like mirror images of ours and would behave exactly the same, but aren’t compatible with ours.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Opposite sugar would be the best “sugar free”/zero calorie alternative. If we had some alien vegetation that grew this. Obesity, diabetes and tooth decay would be a thing of the past. Real sugar, completely indigestible to humans.