• myyass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So reading the comments; most people that race don’t generally want to destroy their car.

    And yes, you can drop gears down and floor it but there’s a high risk of all sorts of damage and your clutch won’t talk to you for days after. That’s why you want to bring your car on a trailer for track days. Also tires are expensive; burning through 2k in a day is rough.

    Constant shifting is done for temperature maintenance often. Not everyone has a million dollar team to perfect everything.

    I think while it’s cheesy, the first race in fast and the furious was slightly accurate when you start pushing the limits of your car and it starts falling apart. Vibrations get intense, sometimes you just back out; I did around 140 on a straight and I was like nah man you take win.

    Lookup Lemons Races; it’s all about keeping your shitbucket from breaking down and not getting cooked(and yourself).

  • blackshirt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My favourite part is when they show the hero and his car is making fast car noises and he shifts like crazy going fast and drifting and yet the bad guy/cop is still tailgating him with his old beat up truck.

  • jason@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Want to take a second to recognize the need for speed movie trying to be more “real” than fast and furious by not using CGI, but somehow coming out more fake. Back road racing with lots of turns. Not a single downshift in the whole movie.

  • vithigar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I also enjoy when they quickly pull up alongside then match speed and remain side by side rather than overtake.

  • optional@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s so funny how everyone here discusses how the race scene in this or that spy movie is unrealistic. Actually the most unrealistic thing is that the Chinese spy and the US spy would be racing to steal their secret in the first place, while in reality they would just seduce one another to steal their secrets. In a realistic movie, the bank robber wouldn’t race against the police either, he would just shut down his computer.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I maintain that Rush is one of the best racing movies ever made.

    Both Chris Hemsworth and Daniel Bruhl were DEEP in their respective roles. And to top it off the score by the LEGENDARY Hans Zimmer.

    The fact that it won no academy awards is proof that the Oscars are run by a bunch of idiots.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Meanwhile the F1 movie was terrible. It didn’t use the “oh, I’m behind, I better drive faster” trope, but it did involve the driver doing ridiculous things that wouldn’t have worked, and would have resulted in their being disqualified from the race.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Entire movie: “This guy always overtakes on the inside”.

    Final race: “OH MY GOD! Is he overtaking on the outside?!? HE NEVER DOES THAT! He is! He is overtaking on the outside!!!”

    Yes, it was a Nascar movie.

  • sobchak@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I used to watch NASCAR with my dad as a kid (and play racing sims). There’s a lot of fuel, tire management, and drafting effects involved, so they actually don’t go all out at all times. It’s actually kinda interesting from a strategic perspective; just not interesting to watch, IMO.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah. I don’t shit on NASCAR because of the skill involved. It actually does take a lot of skill. There’s a lot of strategy too. But, for the audience, you’re watching cars going around an oval at a fairly constant speed. Almost none of these skill and strategy decisions are visible to the audience. The driver may know when they move out of position and are no longer drafting the car in front of them effectively, but I’m sure 99% of the audience can’t tell.

      You do realize there are racing series where cars have to brake hard, accelerate hard, turn both right and left. Plus, you don’t have to give up on the deeper stuff like tire strategy, drafting, etc. All that is still part of the sport, but you get the addition of regular exciting things you get to actually watch.

      • sobchak@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Heard stuff like F1 kinda sucks to watch in person because you just see a small portion of the track. Idk, I’ve never seen that or NASCAR in person. Have seen a couple Sprint car races which was kinda cool (tractor pulls and destruction derby’s too).

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I haven’t watched a race in person, but I know someone who works for one of the F1 teams. He says that you see more if you watch on TV because you can’t see the entire circuit, but you can’t really understand the speed and power of the cars if you only watch on TV. The best compromise is to find a great spot at the circuit where you can see the cars braking hard and turning, but where you can also see a screen that shows action at other parts of the circuit. Unfortunately, the people who run the circuits know that’s the best place to watch and the best experience, so you have to pay a huge amount for that. If you just get a general admission type ticket, you’re probably going to have to watch somewhere where you can only see the cars zoom past, without any TV screen to tell you the state of the race.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    22 hours ago

    And then they shift in a higher gear, allowing them to drive nearly twice as fast, because they didn’t think of that before

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      17 hours ago

      An infinite number of times too. I don’t know what’s more infinite in this world, the number of gears in a car in a fast and furious movie, or the number of bullets in their guns.

      • f314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Drive, which is otherwise an excellent movie, has a car chase where you can hear a gear shift while they’re reversing.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          16 hours ago

          A few cars had two reverse gears, and I think they were valued as getaway cars for that reason!

          • No1@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Old British war Jeeps -and probably others- had transmissions where you can go as fast backwards as you cwn forwards. You actually shift through the gears in reverse.