• Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seriously. Fewer and fewer people are using Google as a search engine anyways. I know it’s miniscule, but people are aware of Duck Duck go, and aware of Google’s spy apparatus, hence why in any survey or poll they conduct they ask the user’s opinion on how well they think Google is doing with their private data. I always score them the lowest possible.

        What we should be concerned with is how many websites and third party logins use Google.

      • Sstadler06@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People are just resistant to change because the GPM to YTM transition sucked when they released a half baked app

      • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh man, Google surveys is dead? That stuff was useful for so many things, I’m legitimately saddened by its loss.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Are you mixing it up with Google Forms? I think most people would never have used surveys, whereas forms is pretty popular. And they sound the same.

          • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I liked Google surveys when I had an Android phone. I did a survey here and there and it would pay for my Duolingo subscription

            • candybrie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think that’s google opinion rewards. Or at least Google opinion rewards is the same thing.

              • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh yeah you’re right. In that case, I’m not surprised Surveys is dead. I had never heard of that one

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That site has a bit of inflation to it.

        Like, some of those things are just standalone apps that got merged into other products. Like Fitbit coach is now just part of the Fitbit app.

  • loie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    google

    one app

    does one thing

    google

    why is this so hard to understand

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s likely not financially viable to have separate teams for their many products that all have similar features. Consolidating makes more sense because they can actually afford to maintain development.

      Honestly, they should just roll YouTube Music into the default YouTube app, as well. And they probably will at some point. It just doesn’t make sense to have these services - which are basically all the same, functionally-speaking - spread out across multiple apps.

      • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, they should just roll YouTube Music into the default YouTube app, as well.

        I don’t think I could disagree more. I use both and listening to music and watching videos are entirely different activities for me and I want the apps to do different things in different ways.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The UI and use case for a video platform and a music app are very, very different

        • Chunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          My phone makes phone calls and browses the Internet. There are things that can do multiple things.

          The use case is not different. There is already music on YouTube. I rarely watch YouTube but I listen to it a lot. You’re not actually upset about the new app, you’re excited to shit on a company with harmful practices and you’re grasping at any argument you can find.

          • greenskye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, I use both YouTube and YouTube music and they need different UIs and ways of navigating. While you could cram all of YouTube musics UI into a subsection of YouTube, it really doesn’t make sense to do so. I’m not just shitting on Google just because, I’m saying that the needs of music listening and YouTube video watching are different for many people.

            Honestly sounds like you don’t even need youtube, just YouTube music if all you ever use it for is listening.

      • sim642@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s likely not financially viable to have separate teams for their many products that all have similar features.

        Clearly Google doesn’t follow that logic because they have numerous competing chat apps. Even Google Maps has chat…

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man, I really did like Google Podcasts.

    It was way better than the other podcast apps. And coming from iTunes, it was a smooth transition.

    This sucks. Open source your shit, Google, and I promise we’ll keep it going.

        • Eczpurt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          When I switched to android I was looking for Play Music to buy some new songs and it had shut down shortly after I purchased my pixel. Real disappointing since I prefer to just buy a song here and there instead of subscribing to a streaming platform.

          Some artists provide a digital download on their websites but it’s uncommon. If there’s a viable alternative to Play Music I’d love to hear about it!

          • ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            For buying music, besides the big names like Amazon/iTunes, you might consider:

            7digital UK or 7digital US, if in neither country, I think it should try to point you to the relevant storefront for yours if they have one.

            Qobuz, which appears to be available in more countries.

            Bandcamp for indies and experimental music.

            The first two have a good mix of major labels and indies, so are probably your best bet after Amazon/iTunes, meanwhile Bandcamp is great for more niche and potentially upcoming artists. So far as I can tell there isn’t really just one storefront to go with for buying music unless you’re okay with the aforementioned big names.

            • Eczpurt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hey thanks for the reply! I’ll be sure to check these out. I tried Amazon but I was having trouble finding albums or songs to download specifically. Has to be my mistake since I see it recommended everywhere. Amazon Music is just a streaming service as far as I know?

              Either way I appreciate the input!

              • ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I tried Amazon but I was having trouble finding albums or songs to download specifically. Has to be my mistake since I see it recommended everywhere. Amazon Music is just a streaming service as far as I know?

                I don’t use Amazon for music much myself, but last I did, I think the way I found the download options was to search for the albums themselves as if I was trying to buy a physical copy, which much like books and other stuff, will often present a digital purchase option when available.

                I stopped using it because it just felt way clunkier to deal with, which was even before they got into music streaming if memory serves (or at least, before they had prioritized it).

            • killthefish@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I want to eventually transition from using Spotify to something like that, but my only question would be if I can save the songs locally on my device to use a music player of my choice?

              • ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                All of the sites I linked to offer digital downloads of purchased music to play locally, so yes! I specifically sought these out because I prefer to have local files analogous to owning physical media, as I really don’t like perpetually renting media (i.e. subscription services).

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would be nice if more companies just open sourced the stuff they don’t need or don’t want to maintain anymore.

      Even if no one picks it up, at least it got another chance.

    • pfkninenines@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obviously I can’t know what you have tried before, but I’d highly recommend Pocket Casts. I’ve been using this since at least 2014 (looking at a support chain that I had opened) and can’t imagine losing the features they’ve got. It’s shifted owners a few times and their mobile apps are now open source should you be interested in that.

      • wowbagger@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Worth noting that in October they’re increasing their annual subscription price from $9.99 to $39.99, which is when I’ll be finding another podcast app. I love Pocket Casts but it doesn’t provide $40 worth of functionality for me.

        • Corhen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea, using their app online is worth $10 a year, but $40? For what’s basically a front end? They are out of their mind.

          Do you know if you can export your podcasts from Pocket casts?

          • wowbagger@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure what you would export, just your listening history and favorites? Pocket Casts doesn’t host the actual audio files themselves, those are all available elsewhere online. I doubt there’s an easy way to port your existing subscriptions and such to another app, that would require them all to use a standard format for that data and there’s not really any incentive for that.

            • Corhen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yea, I figured out how to export it, but it doesn export what episodes I’ve.listened to, so I have to go back through my lists and transfer that (I like listening to back catalogs of my favorite podcasts.

              I actually paid for the lifetime app membership a long time ago, so luckily this won’t impact that, but not paying $40usd for just desktop use.

              Does Antenna have a desktop app?

      • Karakangaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is pocket casts usable on pc? The “pocket” part of the name makes me think no, but I used Google podcast to listen to stuff on my pc primarily. It’s a pain to track podcasts I want to listen to and am actively listening to because every podcast company has their own website.

        • pfkninenines@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have a website version but it’s a paid offering, with it being part of a subscription now. It used to be a one-off purchase. Regardless, I haven’t used it before.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What value would oss bring here when it’s the content that matters most? I’m actually really interested to know because I too really liked this app/service.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Podcasts are (generally, Spotify excluded) on an open standard. They’re just RSS feeds. So, the content can be aggregated by anyone. So it’s primarily the UI that will be different between different podcast players.

        • iegod@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure but the hosting of that content isn’t something a front end can solve.

          • ahto@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Podcasts are already hosted by a variety of independent services. Google doesn’t host any podcasts, at least as far as I am aware. In this case it really is a frontend-only problem.

          • candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The RSS feed points to the already hosted files. A lot of people host podcasts on services like libsyn or podbean. I don’t think you can really host podcasts on Google; maybe hacked together on drive or something.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s so wild that Google would rather weaken their own brand than just keep a secondary frontend around. It would require minimal maintenance cost (given the size of their company, just have 1-2 fulltime devs working on keeping it in shape and updated), and it could access the exact same backend as the Youtube Music app.

    Weird.

    And don’t misunderstand me, I really don’t like Google Podcasts for podcasts, but I also admit that having a separate app for podcasts is superior, as you listen to them very differently than you listen to music. Spotify amiably shows how their recommendation algorithms absolutely cannot handle someone listening to both, anyways.

    • mtcerio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They probably want to monetize on podcasts too, in the same way they do on videos and music. At the moment, Google Podcast is completely free and ad-free.

    • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually don’t think it’s a bad decision. I think merging it with YouTube is a good thing. They could integrate tightly with YouTube since they already added a “podcast” feature and you could seemlessly switch between Video and Audio.

      Sooner or later I expected that to happen.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        But to a user, what would the benefit be? Would the UI also change depending on content played to expose the controls specialized for each type of media?

        • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could listen to an epsiode on YouTube then pause and listen to it on YouTube music.

          Would the UI also change depending on content played to expose the controls specialized for each type of media?

          They already kinda do that on YouTube (with YouTube premium). When you watch a music video, you have music controls in the normal YouTube app and a button to switch to YouTube music

          Tbh, they should rather make a new app called "YouTube Podcasts)

  • dlok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I only found and started using this app a couple of months ago wouldn’t have imagined it was on its way out

    Typical Google

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Such a bad idea. Podcasts seek forward and interface actually worked. Zero chance the migration to YouTube is smooth.

    • webjukebox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Before you get used to YTM and they drop that too,

      Sure they will integrate YTM into YT, using just a tab to switch.

      • Stopher@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They already do this on my google TV. The YTM app just opens YT with a music tab. Won’t be long before the mobile apps follow.

  • dr_rugby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s just the Google way… still didn’t get over the RSS reader disaster… Anyways, I tried the app a couple of times: it’s not a great app for listening to podcasts. If you like podcasts, try Antennapod, Pocket Casts or Podcast Addict (and please stay away from Spotify).

    In the end: good riddance.

    • stephenc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never found a single use for RSS because I always found myself just going to the site anyway to read the full thing because 99.999999999% of RSS feeds are trash and it’s easier to just page through the site itself anyway. Podcasts… it feels like a massive waste of time listening to someone discussing something, usually poorly, with tons of exposition, diversions, and other BS. I’d rather just read something instead.

      Good riddance to both.

      • deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        One use for RSS feeds is to distribute podcasts to multiple apps. I believe most podcasts apps are just RSS readers combined with an audio player.