Pascal called for opening roles so that they can be cast by actors of different racial or gender identities than how the character was originally portrayed.

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    are white kids not allowed to have their existing superheroes too that they see themselves in or is that taboo?

    Yes, and they do! So many of them! Imagine that, there are versions of every super hero that people can see themselves! White Batman? Sure! Black Batman? Sure! Asian Batman? Why not? Does having a Black Batman now mean that no white kids are allowed to be Batman? Absolutely not, that would be absurd! They’re Dark Knight Batman, The Batman, 1950s Batman, whatever! That’s the whole thing, it’s a fictional universe, there’s room to play.

    they don’t need to be existing ones though where it doesn’t make any sense.

    Does it make sense their face keeps changing every few adventures?

    Why does this always only apply to white characters?

    Because almost all the major characters in fantasy, comics, sci fi and large movies are white. If there were a dearth of white characters, this would be a very different conversation. But there aren’t.

    I dunno, so far your arguments, as far as I can tell are that: A) It’s creatively shallow and pandering to change the character’s race in a creatively shallow sequel/reboot/remake. This seems a bizzare place to draw a line.

    B) Why can’t white people become the Black heroes? Which also seems a little silly. Like, there aren’t enough white characters we have to go take over the precious few that are Black? But even then, if Hollywood got down with race changing characters, sure, go the other way too. But let’s get a few major moneymakers switching races before we demand that famous Black characters go white.

    • DarkWasp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I appreciate the way you responded to this and I understand where you’re coming from. I don’t have much to add because I feel like you covered it all to be honest. I think my view of what you described was how the comics have done it, Tim Fox is black Batman, Spider-Gwen is female Spider-Man etc. so there is something for everyone.

      Edited: Accidentally used the wrong name for Tim Fox, I used the authors name instead of the characters.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks! A civil online discussion about a potentially heated topic? Lemmy truly is a lovely place!

    • ode@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re playing into corporate’s hands by assuming audiences cannot relate to a narrative if the actors don’t resemble them in some fashion. Their interests are served by having you buy into such a notion. They run social media sock-puppet accounts espousing it everywhere you care to look (like throwing spaghetti at a wall, if we just talk about it enough maybe some of it will stick!). The problem is that the notion is bullshit.

      I love The Wire. It’s the best show about policing. I have nothing in common with black Americans barely living above the poverty line, though. Not behaviour, not worldview, not skin tone, not dress sense. Yet these characters make up three quarters of the cast; and I empathised and sympathised with them all the same. By the same token Lord of the Rings has a broad, enduring reach well beyond the Anglosphere.

      I think much of the fuss over representation in modern media comes down to content producers trying to tailor the consumer to their product. They want us preoccupied with it. And when they’re caught out or backed into a corner on the matter, rather than fess up and admit they have industrial and institutional pressures to deal with (actor employment, Blackrock ESG gamification, etc), they suggest critics are racist instead. Perhaps that really is a better strategic approach than a policy of honesty and respect for the public’s intelligence. But it doesn’t make it true.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re misunderstanding the argument and offering a pretty facile counter-argument.

        The misunderstanding is narrative v aspiration. We are talking about movies and tv shows for children, like Star Wars, the MCU, Star Trek etc. No one is saying people don’t understand or can’t relate to a narrative if the characters don’t resemble them. The argument is that non white kids should have large, classic, mainstream heroes who resemble them too. Rather than just the Enterprise’s tactical officer or engineer but rather, the captain.

        Meanwhile, the argument that content producers are trying to tailor the consumer to the product is, at best, a rather silly notion. If anything, content producers want as broad a base as possible. Unless you believe Netflix wants to be Blackflix, Prime as LatinoPrime etc it’s just nonsensical on its face. And the idea that content producers want us only to care about diversity just comes right out of a silly right wing playbook where any discussion of race or gender is indoctrination being foisted on the unwitting masses. In reality, the folks who complain about the very notion of race swapping a classic character seem to be the ones obessed about race (“Oh no! An imaginary space captain is a different skin tone than the first actor who played that pretend space man!”) The simple truth that most media, for pretty much its entirety, has catered to white men. Things slowly started improving so that women and minorities could participate but rarely as the lead. Now, people are rightfully looking at that as boring and as outdated as Leave it to Beaver.