Starve to death.

Why are you lying in your post title

How dare Elon Musk not be complicit in an act of war! Harumph, I say!

It confuses me that nations open up their doors to immigrants without first building more infrastructure so that both the immigrants and citizens can live together comfortably.

According to who?

I’ve generally figured that they’re to the right of talkRadio, which is in turn to the right of Sky News, which if ofc owned by News Corp which owns Fox News (is it weird that I know this?), but I haven’t gotten a handle on their general positions yet.

Happy to see some good replies here. Yes, it would mean that we’d need to hold car makes responsible for DUIs, Cutco responsible for knife attacks, even baseball bat manufacturers for violent attacks done with baseball bats.

It could also hold companies responsible even if they aren’t actively manufacturing the dangerous item anymore; for example, let’s say that Smith & Wesson stops manufacturing guns. Their guns will still be out in the hands of folks, and they will still be held accountable for the violence.

Edit: To respond to this:

Guns were made, by design, to be effective and efficient at the ending of human lives. Using the firearms in the way they were designed to be used is the primary difference for me

At a very basic level, guns are designed to, I would argue, send a bullet somewhere. If the gun reliably fails to do so (i.e. it jams constantly), or inappropriately deploys the bullet (i.e. it explodes in your face, shoots backwards at the shooter, or is wildly inaccurate), then I could see why the manufacturer could be held responsible, since the product isn’t doing what it’s supposed to do.

LOL

Who told them this was a good idea? Are they so uncertain of their case that they’re bringing for over a hundred witnesses, in case tons of their testimonies fall through?

I’d like this too, especially since I moderate far fewer communities than I subscribe to, it would make it easier to keep tabs on the content that’s being posted.

I think religions are inherently designed to have static principles though, unless the writings of origin are still being written

Didn’t he start supporting gay marriage because that’s the Current Thing position now?

He’s got some balls to accuse other people of replacing faith with ideology.

Can this be used with Mastodon as well?

It looks interesting, but unfortunately only from a technology perspective and not from a content perspective.

European/Canadian spotted lol

What an incredibly European headline.

This is why I love America, the first amendment is dope.

Edit: It’s hilarious to see the usual Lemmy leftists spazzing out in the replies. A lot of them is just them being made about grooming being banned in certain contexts, but the only thing they’re materially wrong is about the general state of physical displays in America as a whole. The local policies of Florida for example aren’t nationalized, they’re locally specific to the state of Florida exclusively.

I mean wasn’t his other lawyer arrested? I can see why he picked a new one. But who knows, Joe Biden’s allies might have this one arrested too.

Yeah the way they wrote that made it seem like the people behind the movie were okay with that decision

Wait there are bots on Lemmy/Kbin/Lotide?

Americans seem to support slavery. Why do Republicans keep trying to block it anyway?

Removed by mod

I guess this is what happens when you give a director creative control over a project!