Daft_ish@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 3 years agoThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.message-squaremessage-square324linkfedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down1123
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1message-squareThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.Daft_ish@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 3 years agomessage-square324linkfedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·3 years agothere is a bureaucratic machine for dealing with this kind of problem
minus-squareThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·3 years agoBut what do we do if every level of that machine is completely controlled by those people?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down3·3 years agoit’s not. there are boards on Wikipedia specifically for calling in neutral editors.
minus-squareHM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoRemoved by mod
there is a bureaucratic machine for dealing with this kind of problem
But what do we do if every level of that machine is completely controlled by those people?
it’s not. there are boards on Wikipedia specifically for calling in neutral editors.
Removed by mod