I have my problems with Meta, but I’m hoping this will help Mastodon grow

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why would they self-host and do work when they could just use Threads? It’s not like FB gives a fuck about treasonous political parties.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The same reason Trump has his own social network.

        Own instances give a lot more control. They can be as outrageous as they like, full on Trumpian, even. They can also control what gets said in that space much more effectively, seeing as how they are the mods and admins. And they don’t have to worry about Meta or Reddit (I doubt Musk even cares) getting media backlash and removing them from the platform entirely.

        Sure, Threads can defed from any controversial instances but it will be trivial to create a mirror that effectively refederates the problem instance.

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The same reason Trump has his own social network.

          Didn’t that only start when he was threatened for being kicked off Twitter?

          But the other points for censoring ideas make sense.

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Didn’t that only start when he was threatened for being kicked off Twitter?

            Exactly. No one is gonna kick you off your own platform, or in fediverse terms, your own instance. The most others can do is defed from you, but that’s easy enough to get around if you’re determined.

    • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is just a guess, but I think that the likelihood of Twitter federating is almost to zero, unless forced by legislations to do so. It simply doesn’t benefit from that, since every group and individual leaving Twitter might as well defederate it, and odds are that the upper echelon there knows it.

      Instead I think that Twitter will try to associate the Fediverse with terrorists and what have you, to indirectly smear shit into its competitor Faecesbook/Threats.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is just a guess, but I think that the likelihood of Twitter federating is almost to zero, unless forced by legislations to do so. It simply doesn’t benefit from that

        That, and Musk’s ego won’t allow it.