• Pipoca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Look at the numbers on the map behind the text.

    77.3 m acres of crops eaten directly by people.

    127.4 m acres of feed crops. 52 m acres fallow.

    The feed crops alone dwarf what’s eaten by people. Both feed and fallow is over double the number of acres of crops eaten by Americans.

    • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      this assumes that none of the exports are eaten directly.

      if this is the best you have, you are basing a pretty heavy claim on a pretty thin interpretation. maybe you can find a better source, but I doubt it. I think you will find that people eat 2/3 of global crop calories. the method of excluding exports from food-uses and including them with animal feed seems sloppy at best, but possibly dishonest.

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sure - if you assume that fewer than 17.1 m acres of the 62.8 m acre category of “other grain and feed exports” (i.e. less than 27% of it) are animal feed, and none of the wheat exports end up in feed, then the total acreage of food eaten by someone and food eaten by animals are equal.

        That seems pretty unlikely, though.

        Global numbers aren’t great, because diets are really different in different countries. The meat eaten by the average American dwarfs the amount of meat eaten by the average Latvian or Peruvian person.