The American-led strikes came in response to more than two dozen Houthi drone and missile attacks against commercial shipping in the Red Sea since the Israel-Hamas war began.

The United States and five of its allies on Thursday carried out military strikes against more than a dozen targets in Yemen controlled by the Iranian-backed Houthi militia, in an expansion of the war in the Middle East that the Biden administration had sought to avoid for the past three months.

The American-led air and naval strikes came in response to more than two dozen Houthi drone and missile attacks against commercial shipping in the Red Sea since November, and after warnings to the Houthis in the past week from the Biden administration and several international allies of serious consequences if the salvos did not stop.

On Thursday night, President Biden called the strikes a “clear message that the United States and our partners will not tolerate attacks on our personnel or allow hostile actors to imperil freedom of navigation in one of the world’s most critical commercial routes.”

In a statement, he warned: “I will not hesitate to direct further measures to protect our people and the free flow of international commerce as necessary.”

Archive

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    171·
    10 months ago

    The Houthi foreign ministry responded to the attacks with a statement that “the U.S. and U.K. must be prepared to pay a heavy price and face the serious consequences of their aggression.”

    “We, the Yemeni people, are not among those who are afraid of America,” he said in a televised speech. “We are comfortable with a direct confrontation with the Americans.”

    For the Biden administration, the decision to finally strike back at the Houthis was three months in coming. Despite the barrage of attacks from the Houthis, the administration had hesitated to respond militarily for a number of reasons.

    There was a fear that strikes on Yemen could escalate into a tit-for-tat between American naval vessels and the Houthis and even draw Iran further into the conflict, officials said.

    It’s like the run-up to a fight where one guy is super wild and aggressive, and one guy is doing everything he can to deescalate and talk the other person down. Usually means the second guy has a lot more experience.

    • Philo@sh.itjust.works
      161·
      10 months ago

      “We, the Yemeni people, are not among those who are afraid of America,” he said in a televised speech. “We are comfortable with a direct confrontation with the Americans.”

      Really? Wouldn’t that look like a Teacup Poodle going up against a Great Dane?

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        131·
        10 months ago

        I mean… there’s a saying in prison, “Anyone can kill you.” Basically, don’t get cocky just because you’re stronger. Someone who’s really determined can fuck up anyone’s day, and the US has a lot to lose.

        I think that’s at the root of the carefulness the US is trying to display. However, all that said, yeah we can fuck ‘em up. I think feeling like kings from winning some real holy-shit-they-can’t-stop-us-taking-the-capital shooting wars, and the real injustice of the Palestinians’ suffering in Gaza, and feeling like they have some serious regional backing from Iran, may have led them to not really be fully aware of how thoroughly drone strikes and cluster bombs could fuck up their whole country without the US even needing to take its eyes off the main events in Gaza and Taiwan.

        It’s easy to feel like a king while it’s mostly other people on the receiving end of the bullets.

      • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
        111·
        10 months ago

        Well, they can certainly cause a lot of trouble in the region that we really don’t need right now. That’s not nothing. And they kind of already are doing just that.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    69·
    10 months ago

    For the Biden administration, the decision to finally strike back at the Houthis was three months in coming.

    Weird framing from the NYT on this with “finally”. Like this was inevitable and Biden was objectively slow to respond. Nothing about this was inevitable, nor were the prior attacks necessarily demanding response from the United States. We can be word police. Or we can not.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      121·
      10 months ago

      I mean, they were launching direct attacks on US Navy ships. Frankly, not responding to that is unusual.

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      111·
      10 months ago

      Self-defense is not a world police action. The Houthis attacked us directly, and now they’re 😮 that we defended outselves.

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      410·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, there probably wouldn’t even BE any Houthi terrorist attacks if not for the US-backed atrocities in Yemen and Gaza…

      The only things that come from fighting terrorism via warfare is a lot of dead people (mostly civilians) and MORE terrorism.

        • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
          25·
          10 months ago

          And you seem to be forgetting about the Saudi-led proxy war between them and Iran with the Houthis caught in the middle. The one that most people not working in Congress or the White House agree is an abominable atrocity.

          Iran bad ≠ Saudi-led atrocities good