• Alto@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    That doesn’t really solve anything. As long as there is profit to be made, people will horrendously abuse it. That’s not something we want when were in the middle of a homeless crisis yet we have more than enough empty housing for them.

    Maybe once everyone’s basic housing needs are met we can talk, but until then no.

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Individuals owning a single rental property aren’t really the problem here. Many individuals and small groups own dozens of LLCs and REITs each with their own residential properties. Many corporations own multiple thousands of residences.

      Freeing the residences from the clutches of the corporate interests would make such a huge impact that the real estate prices would normalize. At least temporarily.

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        My point wasn’t that you can’t have a rental home, it’s that you shouldn’t stop the increase in tax rate at 3. If you want to try to have a 4th or 5th you can, you’re just going to be paying an exorbitant property tax rate to the point where viewing real estate as an investment is moronic.

          • Alto@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I think you’re misunderstanding my point. Frankly the terms “investment” and “housing” don’t belong near each other in the first place. “Making it similar to other Investments” is still putting those two words way the fuck too close to each other.

            Nobody cares if you’re renting out Grandma’s house to pay for her nursing home currently (even though that’s an entirely separate problem that absolutely needs addressing). That’s not what the majority of rentals are.