It’s one of the first things I would expect from a site like this. I know that J.K. Rowlings views are very controversial to put it mildly, but:

  1. The fandom/books are not the author
  2. Harry Potter will become a part of the Fediverse at some point anyways - better to support it early on and shape its developing rather than having a company build a H.P. social network on top of the fediverse, which will be to our disadvantage
  3. In terms of potential users, this could be huge for the threadiverse
  4. We are in the Fediverse: defederation is always a possibility

Or was it just never tried before / no one wanted to yet?

  • rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Sure, but it seems like that the “need” for independence would come only after the community is already established and some type of conflict came up that made it impossible for them to stay in any of the other already-existing instances.

    To put in concrete terms: I wouldn’t have any problem to create a HP community on a topic-specific instance like https://metacritics.zone. @blue_berry@lemmy.world, would you be interested in that? I can make you mod if you want.

    • Kayn@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Waiting for a conflict to arise just leaves you with a fractured community in the aftermath.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        In the aftermath of what? The community hasn’t even formed and you are anxious about an imaginary problem?

        • Kayn@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          The aftermath of the conflict you referred to in your previous comment.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Again, this would be in the chance some “conflict” happened.

            Do you think it’s reasonable that people shouldn’t even try to go for the lower-hanging fruit because they see a potential conflict that will lead to some more work?