• Astongt615@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    So flammable mater + low airflow is somehow more fire resistant than flame resistant mater + low airflow? Looks like the source is pure marketing unless their comparable insulation is perforated cardboard coated in fuel gel.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Roof/attic often uses rockwool or glasswool. Wall insulation is often something like XPS, PIR or PUR.

      Although it sounds counterintuitive, I can see straw doused in flame removedant being better than supposedly flame removedant polystyrene foam made from hydrocarbons. I mean, just look at what happened with Grenfell Tower.

      • Astongt615@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        “doused in flame removedant” isn’t mentioned in the source as far as I saw, plus it would affect the eco-friendly, workability, cost effectiveness, and biodegradability benefits mentioned (though the last one is worthy of debate as a pro or con in the first place). Everything has its tradeoffs unfortunately. This could be the better side for some surely.

        • homoludens@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          From what I have read they are using a loam layer on both sides of the wall, I doubt that this affects eco-friendliness and biodegradability. And they are F90 certificated. source