lawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 years agoClimate Summitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square112linkfedilinkarrow-up11.91Karrow-down123
arrow-up11.89Karrow-down1imageClimate Summitlemmy.worldlawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square112linkfedilink
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·2 years agoIt’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down12·edit-210 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down2·2 years agoIt would cost far more to not address the issue.
minus-squarelieuwex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·2 years agoBut the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 years agoNo, it’s making fun of that assumption.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-210 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 years agoSo, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-210 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoWhat conversation are we having?
It’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
deleted by creator
It would cost far more to not address the issue.
But the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
No, it’s making fun of that assumption.
deleted by creator
So, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
deleted by creator
What conversation are we having?
deleted by creator