Yemeni rebels attempting to impose a blockade on Israel fired rockets on a British ship and reportedly managed to sink it, the first time it has succeeded since the start of Israel's war on Hamas in Gaza
You know this only works if you posted a question first, which you haven’t, right?
But I do see a pattern. Everyone who is not in line with your simplistic world view is being accused of being in support of the genocide. Maybe you should learn how to differentiate.
I felt obliged to ask it for you since not being a genocide apologist seems outside of the realm of possibility for you.
learn how to differentiate.
There is no center here. If you oppose the only ones willing to lift a finger against genocidal white supremacism it’s perfectly clear which side you are most comfortable on.
Its true. Even in wars there is a rule of law. Attacking civilians is forbidden. But that thought of sparing non-combattants doesn’t seem to apply in this case in the eyes of some very just people who rightfully codemn a genocide. Dehumanizing as a response to dehumanization… It’s ironic.
Why not?
Any country supporting Israel deserves to have all it’s ships sent to the bottom of the ocean.
How were they supporting Israel?
Does that ship not belong to a British corporation?
So belonging equals supporting and justifies destructive action?
You mean… like belonging to a people living on land coveted by a white supremacist settler-colonial project justifies destructive action?
The answer you were looking for is “no, belonging does not equal supporting”.
The answer you’re looking for is “I need to stop being a genocide apologist.”
You know this only works if you posted a question first, which you haven’t, right?
But I do see a pattern. Everyone who is not in line with your simplistic world view is being accused of being in support of the genocide. Maybe you should learn how to differentiate.
I felt obliged to ask it for you since not being a genocide apologist seems outside of the realm of possibility for you.
There is no center here. If you oppose the only ones willing to lift a finger against genocidal white supremacism it’s perfectly clear which side you are most comfortable on.
deleted by creator
How exactly, with detail, does that make them a target?
Is the UK supporting genocide?
Yes? No?
Idk. I know the US is but if you would like to present some evidence about the UK, I would be willing to look at it.
What? Did you think British support for this white supremacist monstrosity simply ceased after they essentially created it way back when?
What other blatantly obvious history do you need updating on? You do know that COVID-19 is a thing, right?
You know, you are a dick.
Thank you for the information.
Good luck in life, I am blocking you
Terrorist .
Its true. Even in wars there is a rule of law. Attacking civilians is forbidden. But that thought of sparing non-combattants doesn’t seem to apply in this case in the eyes of some very just people who rightfully codemn a genocide. Dehumanizing as a response to dehumanization… It’s ironic.
Better a (so-called) “terrorist” than a fascist sympathizer.