• JoBo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s a very weird corporate structure. They started with a not-for-profit, only-for-the-good-of-mankind woo company. Then they started a for-profit subsidiary (with Microsoft investing in it) which is supposedly under the control of the non-profit. And now Altman has got rid of the non-profit board members who were sceptical about him.

    Musk is precisely the wrong person to be asking the questions. But there are some questions that need to be answered.

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        He has expensive lawyers. He’s sacked all the ones that disagree with him. And he has been launching some wildly optimistic actions, so I guess we will see.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Not really. His twitter suits agaisnt the journalists that show twitter is welcoming nazis with open arms are all hilariously weak. They fail on 4 or different levels at once and are all basic SLAPP suits that will fail immediately on actual review.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well, they got him out of calling a hero rescuer a pedo. Of course they can’t win impossible cases where the other part has good lawyers too.
          But maybe he use different lawyers now?