Whether you’re really passionate about RPC, MQTT, Matrix or wayland, tell us more about the protocols or open standards you have strong opinions on!

  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
    cake
    OPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is it practical outside of academia? I heard the learning curve is kinda big

    • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nope and yep. It’s an incredible tool, but it’s got a vim-sized learning curve to really leverage it plus other significant drawbacks. Still my beloved one-and-only when I can get away with it, but its a bit of a masochistic acquired taste for sure.

      Template tweaking, as I imagine academia heavily relies on, is really the closest to practical it gets. You do still get beautiful results, it’s just hard to express yourself arbitrarily without really committing to the bit.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        cake
        OPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Outside of academia, would you say it still provides significant upside over markdown?

        • TechNom (nobody)@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Markdown and LaTeX are meant for entirely different purposes. It’s somewhat analogous to HTML vs PDF. While it’s possible to write books with Markdown, it’s a vastly inferior solution compared to latex or typst (for fixed format docs like books).

      • embed_me@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s got a vim-sized learning curve to really leverage it

        As a regular vim user, I have to say. Vim makes sense after you put some effort into learning it. I can’t say the same about latex.