• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, I’ve recently talked with my therapist about this choice between very slow, very hard work and sitting on my butt dreaming. And about the idea that it’s better to avoid action than to act, if I’m not sure I’ll act right. And how it apparently came to me in my teens, when I’ve been doing martial arts for some time, girls would smile at me often, and in general I thought I might be too stupid and happy and there should be something smarter. That ‘smarter’ was, of course, just another teenage idea of being wise and not like everyone else. Fucked up my life for a decade.

    By the way, people who’d be removed and theoretical and talk about some imagined third movement created via some magic other than voting - would be called ‘idiots’ in ancient Athens. Because they are on the side of an idea, not real politics. Then it became a rude word.

    Any such decision to try and find a smart shortcut, or that it’s better to wait and see how it goes instead of sweating, - are all wrong and are exactly what propaganda works for. Being honest is smarter than being dishonest. And voting for the party most fitting your ideals is smarter than for the lesser evil.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tell that to all the people who will be hurt if that protest vote enables someone worse.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Voting for the party that is consciously using the other one as a boogeyman will enable someone worse with no doubt. They are both worse.

        And before the actual ballots are being cast, the public opinion sending right signals to Dems would reduce that risk.

        • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah, because only the democrats spread rhetoric that the other party is a boogeyman . The alt-right never said the libs want to turn you kids gay and/or trans.

          Also, who says Harris is a communist, dumbass?

          My man, please watch the news. You’re so full of shit it’s actually hilarious.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That is the most selfish possible way to approach life. You’re not the main character, other people’s lives are at stake. Voting a specific way just to make yourself feel better knowing you are endangering others by doing so is not some morally superior choice.

          Risking letting someone win who conspired to overthrow an election and who has promised his supporters that if they elect him this time they won’t have to vote ever again. Selfish naive children. Fuck Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the rest of the Democratic machine, at least you’ll be able to vote again and you might actually get to negotiate for things that make people’s lives better.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            You’re not the main character,

            You are. You are also responsible for your own choices whether you admit it or not.

            That is the most selfish possible way to approach life.

            If taking responsibility is selfish, then selfishness is a virtue.

            at least you’ll be able to vote again and you might actually get to negotiate for things that make people’s lives better.

            They are already threatening you with Trump if you don’t vote for them and don’t want to compromise. So about that “you’ll be able to vote again” - I think that’s true, but since that threat works, that’ll likely be the same kind of choice over and over. When you agree to get owned for protection, you usually don’t get owned just once.

            Selfish naive children.

            For fuck’s sake, are you 16?

            How can a grown person be that arrogant without knowing shit about game theory?

            • davidagain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              People who proport to support Palestine, but advocate actions that allow a win for Donald “I’m the best king of Israel ever” Trump and his “Finish them” Israeli bomb-signing Republican party aren’t being honest with the people they’re debating with.

              It is utterly unprincipled republicanism when people PRETEND to care and then advocate allowing the fascist KKK racist maniac genocidal republican party to win.

              • vatlark@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                This post was reported. I think the objection would be to the second paragraph where it sounds like you are making a claim about the character of the person.

                We want this to be an inviting place where people can share what they are passionate about. Everyone is free to attack each other’s opinions and stances. However, there are rules against attacking individuals and groups of people.

                Not only is it against the rules but there are much more effective methods of arguing. Ad hominem attacks are poor at persuasion.

                Do you mind rewriting the second paragraph to focus on the arguments made in the prior comment, rather than the character of the person?

                • davidagain@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I hate this idea that it’s somehow principled to allow the fascist to win. How can you tell the difference between a right wing troll trying to let their KKK supporting maniac destroy America, Palestine and Ukraine, and a left wing person with principled objections who wants to vote against Harris? You can’t. They’re advocating the same actions with the same outcomes. I can’t tell which you are, but please wake up to the real world or shut up trolling people who actually care.

                  • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    hate this idea that it’s somehow principled to allow the fascist to win.

                    i hate to break it to you, but the secret service is allowing him to win. the democrat-run justice department is allowing him to win. you are allowing him to win. you could stop him. but you don’t really believe he’s a threat. you’re just berating people who won’t join your team.

                • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  .ml user pretends they don’t understand basic common sense regarding the US election. News at 11.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              2 months ago

              Are “approved” political opinions the new standard for adulthood?

              DNC please assign me a komissar 🤡

              • roofuskit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                No, but it takes a child to feel morally superior when they enabled people to hurt others because the other option was imperfect.

                • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Dude your option is actively, currently hurting people! That’s not “imperfect”, it’s literally Hitler levels of supporting a genocide. Talk about selfish lol.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Wtf is this even supposed to mean?

                  “Vote for my guy OR you will hurt kittens”

                  Vote the regime is the vote to hurt people. So why are you trying to hurt us?

                  • ripcord@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Man, you must be buying straw in bulk. All these strawmen you’re building in this thread…

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I honestly tried to read and understand this but it really sounds like a bunch of nonsense.