• Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Sadly I blame everyone but starlink. It provides internet to rural areas that otherwise don’t have any viable high speed internet. Feds and states should have done anything to make sure these areas were being served. They weren’t and as a result $120/mo internet is reasonable.

    • setInner234@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Rural UK here. Tiny country in comparison to the US. Our village has no mobile signal. Our landline internet maxes out at 1mbit up and 10mbit down. We are 3miles from a town with 15k people. Why is there no infrastructure? I’m completely dependent on Starlink.

    • asbestos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You speak about the US but it fucked the sky up for the entire planet, for all of us.

      • survirtual@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Fucked up the sky for all of us? Who is “all of us”? Most of “us” live in mega cities with so much light pollution it blots out the night sky. Everyone in these horrid concrete jungles has high speed internet and absolutely no connection to the stars. Many of these people have never even seen the stars.

        The ones living outside of these cities are the minority, and now they have internet. An internet they have been promised to the tune of countless billions for a very long time. They see the stars every night. Starlink has not impacted their connection with the stars at all.

        So I am genuinely curious. Who, exactly, is the “us” you refer to?

        And why are you not rallying against the light pollution that has denied billions access to the stars for at least generations?

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s the main issue I see here, too. If you can provide this without the side effect, per-country, sure. Go ahead. Cool service.

      • Zomg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        He’s kinda right though…

        Remember when the US govt. provided incentives for major ISPs to upgrade\expand their service and they just kinda pocketed the money and did nothing? Imagine if they didn’t. We may not have had a need for starlink.

        • zante@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          well maybe your right, maybe slowing down research and impeding the scientific progress of the human race is a small price to pay for getting Grandma in Bumfuck, Montana onto Facebook, and maybe these so called scientists should stop poking around the universe anyway, right ?

          • Bizzle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Isn’t Starlink a major player in getting high speed Internet to developing nations? I’m as mad as you about ruining the sky, but it’s not just Grandma it’s also entire villages in the global south.