• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    On top, there are significant costs for hosting

    I read somewhere that AWS hosting would cost $2bn/year vs advertising revenue of 30bn/year

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is there a credible source for the costs of hosting? Wikipedia is listing similar ad revenues as you did but no info on the costs. YouTube has 2.7 billion users that watch in average around 11 hours of videos a month. If 2 billion USD/y would be sufficient to host all that that’d be just 0,74 USD/user*year or 0,06 USD per month. That sounds really cheap considering that you have to pay for storage, traffic, backups and redundancies (at least I never heard of significant outages or data loss on YT).

      Does anyone have a credible source on the number of employees YouTube has? If you search for that you fine vastly different number from just 2k to 189k employees.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s a cope by lemmings trying to justify why they deserve to watch lagfree, adfree, hd videos, by thousands of creators on demand anywhere in the world for free.