An analyst believes that the Apple Vision Pro 2 will ship with the more advanced M5 and will enter mass production in H2 2025
  • TheFriar@lemm.eeEnglish
    417·
    2 months ago

    Didn’t people’s lackluster interest in the first one and the pitiful sales numbers convey that we don’t really give a shit?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
      161·
      2 months ago

      It wasn’t lack of interest it was a lack of money. It was an interesting product that I would have probably bought but was ludicrously expensive. I can practically pay off my mortgage for the amount they wanted

      • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.worldEnglish
        103·
        2 months ago

        The price was definitely a primary factor, but it wasn’t the only one. The Vision Pro is a bulky thing with a dingleberry on a string and many reviewers noted the uncomfortable headband situation. It, like may headsets, is also a royal pain in the ass to deal with if you wear glasses and/or need really specialized lenses.

        But a really big factor was that it’s an Apple product. Word travelled fast about how limited the software is and how you can’t really do much with it. Apple is going to have a hard time selling these things until they crawl out of their own ass and actually let people use their products how they wish to. One of the biggest appeals of AR computing is how it bridges together computing with your imagination, and that doesn’t really work when Apple says “no, you can’t do that because it doesn’t match our company vision”

    • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.orgEnglish
      6·
      2 months ago

      Fix the Mac mirroring mode to allow floating windows/multiple displays, and make a cost reduced version that still has good resolution and is around the same price as two high-end monitors.

      You could improve your desktop setup, and take your monitors with you on the go. I think there’s a good usecase there. They just have to figure it out.

      Personally I’m more interested to see what happens with Valve Deckard.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.eeEnglish
    171·
    2 months ago

    I imagine this will be priced in a similar way to a flagship IPhone or a macbook, as it sounds like it has similar processing power on board.

    What is the use case for something like this? Who will be buying it once the novelty wears off?

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldEnglish
          16·
          2 months ago

          AR replaces all screens, buttons and interfaces with holograms. This can be a hologram with the shiny lines you see in many sci-fi, replacing laptop screens, fiddly little interfaces for gadgets, … These things would also be great for designing stuff, teaching using proper models instead of pictures in a book.

          Or it can be indistinguishable from real-life, such as having an empty paper book and have the AR glasses overlaying an e-book, such that it reads, looks, feels and smells like a classic tome. Weather predictions look like a note stuck to your door.

          Then you have entertainment. That goes from table top games look like they are on the table, to running around outside casting fireballs and chain lighting.

          Or it can be an ad riddled nightmare where everything you look at and your reaction is recorded and shared by corporations.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            73·
            2 months ago

            it can will be an ad riddled nightmare where everything you look at and your reaction is recorded and shared by corporations.

            • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldEnglish
              5·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, the first app for AR should be one that identifies people that are in the list of business persons or celebrities and show their net worth over their head like it’s a reward for a game. Then watch as bespectacled grimy folks start following the rich bastards around and AR is outlawed.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
            32·
            2 months ago

            fiddly little interfaces for gadgets

            You can already do that with an app.

            The technology is definitely cool but unless they can significantly reduce the price it’s just not worth it

        • MrSebSin@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          71·
          2 months ago

          For the everyday person, it replaces a big monitor/TV.

          I know immersion yada yada, but it’s really for watching media, playing video games or taking a Pornhub break. Meta/Apple et al really missed the mark on their target audience and price points.

        • baggachipz@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          41·
          2 months ago

          I could see using it if I didn’t look like a lost ski slalom racer. Like Meta’s new glasses, but not chunky and stupid. Like, if it looked like a normal pair of glasses. Identifying people, objects, reviews by just looking at a thing, those sort of things would be handy.

          Apple Vision Pro? Nah thanks.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    151·
    2 months ago

    Spatial computing is arguably incredibly useful but all depends if people feel comfortable wearing it for extended amounts of time.

    The first one was a cool tech demo, i suppose this one will be more an early adopter version but i don’t see the tech being mature enough to have people stop using a laptop.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
      143·
      2 months ago

      People keep telling me it’s useful but I literally cannot think of a single use for it.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pubEnglish
    91·
    2 months ago

    Apple doesn’t have AI in their products. No. No. AI is lame, over hyped, and consistent under delivers, not even going to mention the ecological impact. They have Apple Intelligence, which… look, I know how it sounds, but Apple promises that it’s not AI.

  • curiousaur@reddthat.comEnglish
    91·
    2 months ago

    I just hate all their separate OSes. I’d buy an iPad pro if it ran osx. I’d buy this thing if it ran osx. I’m not buying a powerful $3k computer that can only run apps.