Thanks for the write-up, very good explanation.

The first paragraph didn’t really seem to matter with regard to camo. The second one makes sense. If there were non-camo options for silent clothing, would you pick one over the other?

Is this a fact or speculation?

Right I’m just thinking of it with regard to deer hunting which afaik is the most popular type. Duck hunters, turkey hunters, sure… camo would help. But there’s so much “lifestyle gear” specifically depicting deer hunting which is all camo print.

There are plenty of lgbtq communities in the fedi. For Lemmy and piefed, maybe search those and read their rules? I bet some of them would allow an ad if done by a posting member who isn’t too shameless or spammy.

Brilliant. They even make camo Busch light cans. Guess they thought of everything!

I sold most of my index fund and bought SCHD. It’s an etf that holds shares in companies who pay the biggest dividends. This doesn’t entirely shield you, but those bullshit “growth” bubble companies tend not to pay large dividends to their shareholders.

Nice side effect of the etf is you get dividends every quarter too

Most of the hunters I know sit in a tree stand and chug Busch lights. So it’s basically a sniper nest. And they wear camo because… reasons?

But if you’re moving slowly, isn’t that enough? The camo still seems useless in this context. I get wearing orange but as far as I can tell, the camo pattern is entirely useless.

Anthropic says

…and that’s when I move on.

It’s just seasoning like a good cast iron skillet

Classic selfish right-wing cunt behavior.

Here’s the problem for Tesla: their “full self driving” doesn’t fucking work. I had it for years (first run model 3) and it was always 1 step forward, 1 back. Make one thing better, another gets worse. This was still the case when I dumped my 3 after The Salute. I never got what I paid for.

They’re clearly still in the same predicament, so instead they have “supervisors” remote-controlling the cars. Musk simply refuses to acknowledge this fact and keeps promising it indefinitely. And people keep believing it.

I have an old tennis racquet that I keep on the deck when I’m outside. That thing can fuck up some carpenter bees.

wat

You! You’re the one who shared it with the world.

I just hate these soft-language bait headlines when reporting on scientific studies. If the article was “going from shitty fast food diet to plant-based shitty fast food diet results in statistically healthier outcomes”, that would be interesting and newsworthy. But the whole “doing this thing may affect other thing” allows the reader to apply their biases to whatever they’re reading.

Language evolves over time

may