• Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    No I think the point is that of course she campaigns in swing states cause she wants to get to 5% of the vote so she can get access to more money. But it’s the same stayes everyone is paying attention too.

    Its false logic to say she’s only dangerous in those states cause they are already close and we just have to pay extra attention to them because they are the swing states.

    Is coincidental pattern seeking.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Its false logic to say she’s only dangerous in those states cause they are already close and we just have to pay extra attention to them because they are the swing states.

      The 5% can come from Cali alone and not effect the race tho.

      And it would be cheaper because of less competition for ads, the voters there are often ignored and would more receptive, and there are way more voters who are left of the Dem.party there

      If she is honestly trying to do what she says, then she is doing it in the least efficient way possible and has been for a very long time.

      If what she’s really doing is trying to hand Republicans the election, then she seems to have put a lot of thought into the best possible way to do it and is focusing on that.

      So take your pick:

      1. She’s honest but a terrible leader and absolutely dog shit at planning.

      2. She’s a liar but either her or her handlers have put a lot of thought into how to get trump elected.